AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Emily Evans

PHILB12 · PHIL1319 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
86.36%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with reading and written work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear feedbackReading heavyFair gradingGreat lectures
  • , and approachable teaching.
  • The course is usually manageable, but , and writing.
  • Online reviews are positive but more likely to mention slow grading, self-teaching, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Many students earn A or B grades and call the class fair, but , and effort still matter.

Online evidence supports fair effort, while but still requires reading and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Most students find the class manageable because , but reading and abstract philosophy content can still be challenging.

In-person reviews describe the course as easier with lecture guidance, while online .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, while others say it is optional but useful.

, and in-person students often say showing up improves outcomes.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and helpful.

Both formats are recommended, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Students often describe grading as fair or reasonable, though some call her tough on papers.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are more forgiving.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

The workload is usually manageable but , and homework.

Format shift

Online work leans reading and assignments, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently praise her as , and helpful.

Format shift

In-person reviews are strongest on lectures and support, while and feedback.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and exams without one single dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and papers, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and manageable workload, with attendance often useful or required.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Very understanding! Very helpful! Great lectures!”
PHILB12
“ , but her lectures provide essential insights into the work and tests.”
PHILB12

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students generally like the , and feedback, though .

Main concern

Online students may need patience with and enough discipline for reading-heavy work.

What students said

“ ”
PHILB12
“The course is good if you need the credits and prefer minimum communication.”
PHILB12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams, tests, papers, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Study For ExamsMakeup TestsPapersReading-Based Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book rules.

Study For ExamsPapersQuizzes
“make sure to study for exams and show up to class”
PHILB12
“make sure ”
PHILB12

Online

, and assignments, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Makeup TestsPapersReading Heavy
“ ”
PHILB12
“ , and ”
PHILB12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is just a very good professor guys so don't miss out on her courses!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Very understanding! Very helpful! Great lectures!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ !”

⚖️

70/100

“ decently on the work you put in”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and makes it extremely easy to catch up if you attend the lectures.
  • her lectures were not boring, just interesting and helpful.
  • She is an awesome professor and really dissects the material that she presents.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Doesn't overload you.
  • Lots of reading and lectures, but as long as you do the work and pay attention you will pass.
  • Professor Evans class was an easy A, lots of reading and homework but not hard

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Super sweet and easy to talk to, she's one of the yet.
  • , and understanding.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across several years and both formats show a strong, consistent positive pattern with specific details.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 58
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILB1220 reviews
PHIL13192 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 7

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 5

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1