AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Maryam Jalalifarahani

ENGRB47 · ENGRB45 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and can stay on top of sometimes dry material.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHelpfulClear GradingEngaging PersonalitySometimes Boring
  • Students consistently describe her as caring, helpful, and invested in student success.
  • Grades are strong, but students still need to stay ahead and not ignore the class.
  • Lectures can be boring at times, though labs and her personality improve the experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

All reported grades are A-range, but one review warns students to stay ahead and another tags her as a .

There are no online reviews, so all .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Programming and engineering content can be boring or demanding, but her support and .

There are no online reviews, so all course difficulty evidence comes from in-person comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

, while one older review says it was mandatory.

There are no online reviews, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

because , and makes difficult material more approachable.

There are no online reviews, so the recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

All reported grades are A or A-, and students mention and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload seems manageable, but students warn that the class is easy to neglect and requires staying ahead.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students praise her effort, care, humor, and willingness to help struggling students.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and staying ahead, but do not emphasize exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

All evidence is in person and shows a caring, helpful professor with strong outcomes but occasionally boring lectures.

Main concern

Dry lecture material can make the course easy to neglect.

What students said

“please make sure you stay ahead.”
ENGRB45
“She actively teaches and puts in the extra effort to really help you when you're struggling with something.”
ENGRB47
“Sometimes her lectures were hard to get through without falling asleep”
ENGRB47

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She actively teaches and puts in the extra effort to really help you when you're struggling with something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grades, workload, and classroom experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Amazing person, great professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“ .”

📚 Course Effort

82/100

“please make sure you stay ahead.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She actively teaches and puts in the extra effort to really help you when you're struggling with something.
  • , and wants everyone to pass.
  • Amazing person, great professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • please make sure you stay ahead.
  • Sometimes her lectures were hard to get through without falling asleep
  • the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed enough and consistently positive across 2019-2024.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGRB472 reviews
ENGRB451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values