AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

James Selgrath

AGRIB1 · AGBSB6 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Recommended for students who participate and want a supportive, engaging class, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives Good FeedbackHilariousParticipation MattersClear ExpectationsGroup Project Risk
  • Most students , and .
  • The , and speeches rather than effortless grade chasing.
  • One recent in-person review raises a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Passing and strong grades are realistic if , and handle projects, but it is not a free A.

Online reviews make the effort path very clear, while and group project risk.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students call the class straightforward and fun, though speeches, participation, and .

Both formats describe manageable difficulty, with because of group projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, and many comments emphasize showing up and participating.

Online and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and supportive.

Online reviews are consistently positive, while serious group grading complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Most comments say expectations are clear and , but one .

Format shift

Online evidence suggests predictable grading through participation and homework, while and a group grading complaint.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is manageable but , and projects.

Format shift

Online reviews call the projects not too difficult, while and alternate assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Most students describe him as , and passionate, with one outlier negative review.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, though the .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears , and some tests or lectures rather than one single format.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes participation, homework, and projects, while , and one test-heavy tag.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and class value, with one harsh complaint about group grading.

Main concern

Group projects and participation can affect grades, especially when teammates underperform.

What students said

“ and grades fairly while .”
AGRIB1
“Basically your getting graded based on OTHER people”
AGRIB1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe the class as straightforward, supportive, and manageable if they participate and submit work.

Main concern

Students still need to , and prepare for speeches.

What students said

“If you show up, actively participate, and .”
AGBSB6
“There are a few projects but they aren't too difficult and he will help if you need it.”
AGBSB6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews as open-book, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Test Heavy MentionSpeechesProjectsHomework

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but does not clearly prove specific exam rules or proctoring policies.

Test Heavy MentionGroup ProjectsPresentations
“You get to be creative and walk away with valuable information.”
AGBSB6
“The if you cannot make it to the event he asks.”
AGRIB1

Online

Online reviews mention homework, projects, and speeches, but do not clearly prove .

SpeechesProjectsHomework
“There are a few projects but they aren't too difficult and he will help if you need it.”
AGBSB6
“Always participate in class and be prepared for speeches!”
AGBSB6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and grades fairly while .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and project risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“He is fantastic and I would 100% take his class again!”

⚖️

70/100

“ and grades fairly while .”

📌 Participation & Work

72/100

“If you show up, actively participate, and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and grades fairly while .
  • He gives real life examples on how things effect you and is passionate about agriculture/teaching.
  • He is very professional and you can rely on him for anything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's a very straightforward class.
  • If you show up, actively participate, and .
  • His classes can be hard at times but they are very interesting and if you are lost he will help you.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Basically your getting graded based on OTHER people
  • The if you cannot make it to the event he asks.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 10 reviews across several years, both formats, and detailed comments with mostly consistent positive sentiment.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AGBSB67 reviews
AGRIB13 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values