AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Lillian Pimentel-Stratton

CHDVB20 · CHDVB32 · CHDVB23 · CHDV32 · ACDVB20 · CHDV21 · CHDVB36 · CHDVB41 · CHDV42 · CHDVB21 · B21 · CHDVB24 · CHDLB21 · CHDVB42 · 76 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
42.11%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you can manage heavy self-directed work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy workloadPoor communicationTough graderReading and writing heavyMixed grading clarity
  • Students , and heavy reading.
  • Many negative reviews focus on slow or poor communication and .
  • Some students still earn A and complete all work on time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A is possible, but comments repeatedly say , and homework with little support.

Both formats show A grades, but online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is often described as not conceptually hard, but the volume and directions make the course feel difficult.

Online students call the material doable but self-taught, while and lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory, and participation often matters.

Online attendance evidence is mixed, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most negative recommendations come from , and limited feedback.

Both formats include positive exceptions, but the strongest warnings appear in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students frequently call her a tough or .

Format shift

Online complaints emphasize rubric confusion and , while and unclear expectations.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and weekly writing.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online students .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive reviews mention clear rubrics or kindness, but many reviews , and little help.

Format shift

Online teaching is often criticized for slow email support, while and unclear instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears driven mainly , and projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments, though a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews also , and repetitive writing.

Main concern

Students say the workload often feels excessive for the course value.

What students said

“Worst CHDV professor I have had at Bakersfield College.”
CHDVB41
“Very time consuming.”
B21
“A lot of homework, and a ”
CHDVB21

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but often criticize communication, workload, and .

Main concern

Students often feel unsupported when questions or .

What students said

“Since day one terrible communication, the .”
CHDVB24
“Not hard but not fun.”
CHDLB21
“If youre looking for an easy A or B go elsewhere”
CHDVB21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention some tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policySome tests and quizzes mentionedAssignments dominate assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policyQuizzes mentionedFinal mentioned
“The material and the ”
B21
“plus final, plus 7 page outline? NO!”
70773

Online

, but they do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policyTests mentionedAssignments dominate
“ , and discussion posts.”
CHDVB21
“ .”
CHDVB21

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If youre looking for an easy A or B go elsewhere”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Doesn't communicate, grades slowly, overall overloads the work.”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“She gives TOO MUCH work in one week.”

⚖️

25/100

“Professor does not grade fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • There were .
  • She doesn't teach.
  • Lectures are easy to understand just heavy on classwork and homework.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a and you WILL work for a decent grade .
  • Its an easy A.
  • A lot of homework, and a

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Poor communication.
  • She doesn't communicate with her students at all.
  • Answers emails quickly!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

76

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent themes around workload, communication, and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 511
3 out of 510
2 out of 513
1 out of 530

Course coverage

CHDVB2116 reviews
B216 reviews
CHDVB205 reviews
CHDVB364 reviews
ACDVB203 reviews
Show 10 more courses
CHDV323 reviews
CHDLB212 reviews
CHDV212 reviews
CHDVB322 reviews
CHDVB422 reviews
707731 review
CHDV421 review
chdvb231 review
CHDVB241 review
CHDVB411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 4 · A 12

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 7 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1