AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Stacey Gomez

MEDSB37 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can learn from materials independently and keep up with weekly work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReading heavyLots of homeworkMixed communicationSelf-paced learningExtra credit
  • Grades can be , and submit weekly work.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent across reviews, especially for online communication.
  • The course appears manageable but assignment-heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Most reported grades are A or A+, and one online review says multiple attempts make full grades realistic if students read and manage time.

Online evidence includes both an F and an A+, while but mixed teaching value.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The course needs reading and memorization but is described as easy when students use the book and notes.

Online reviews stress weekly reading and memorization, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online reviews report no mandatory attendance, while .

Online attendance is flexible, but .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but weak communication and boring class structure create real risk.

Online recommendation is weakened by response delays, while and self-taught frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

, multiple attempts, and mostly A .

Format shift

Online grading has the clearest leniency evidence through multiple attempts, while but details are limited.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework and multiple weekly assignments, but the work is manageable with time management.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly Friday deadlines, while , and homework.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Reviews split between caring and , and slow to respond.

Format shift

Online experience depends heavily on response speed, while in-person experience depends on tolerance for Pearson-based learning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize , and group projects more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with one student calling the class boring and self-taught and another recommending her as chill and understanding.

Main concern

The class may feel Pearson-driven and low-engagement.

What students said

“I don't feel like I learned anything from the professor herself”
MEDSB37
“The professor is chill and understanding.”
MEDSB37

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between a failed student frustrated by slow replies and an A+ student who found the work easy with reading.

Main concern

Slow online responses can leave students stuck during lectures.

What students said

“ and a half for a response”
MEDSB37
“very easy as long as you read the book and !”
MEDSB37

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyAssignments dominate assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Reviews do not clearly prove in-person exam policyPearson-based work mentioned
“the class was mainly on Pearson”
MEDSB37

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policyAssignments dominate
“ and must be submitted every Friday”
MEDSB37

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“very easy as long as you read the book and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting teaching, workload, communication, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“The professor is chill and understanding.”

📚 Workload Pattern

45/100

“ and must be submitted every Friday”

⚖️ Grade Path

78/100

“Multiple attempts on the it until you get a full grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor lacked enthusiasm.
  • The professor is chill and understanding.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very easy as long as you read the book and !
  • Lots of memorization needed, but should be fine if you manage time well.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Messaging and emailing took long for responses back.
  • and a half for a response

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews exist, so the themes are useful but not stable enough for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MEDSB374 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values