AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

William (Mike) Daniel

CHEMB1A · B1A · CHEMB1B · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take William (Mike) Daniel only if you are ready to work hard, read ahead, and use office hours heavily.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful Office HoursFunnyHeavy WorkloadTough GraderPolarizing Teaching
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found him helpful and .
  • Chemistry content is difficult and , and steady effort.
  • Grades can be fair with partial credit and , but several students call him a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A good grade is possible, but students , and the need to read, practice, and attend office hours.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Chemistry content is repeatedly described as heavy, difficult, and dependent on reading and problem practice.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory, and several comments say skipping class hurts performance.

online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

60/100

Students are split, with strong praise for his help and humor but strong warnings about and workload.

The recommendation score .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some students mention partial credit and , but several also call him a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly describe heavy class demands, lots of , and difficult material.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching is polarizing, with many students praising his help while and vague.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and practice problems.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a polarizing chemistry class where some students praise his help and humor while others criticize and heavy work.

Main concern

Students who .

What students said

“the material was not easy but and he gives partial credit.”
CHEMB1B
“Horrible professor.”
CHEMB1B
“Be prepared to work”
B1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments are mixed, with and one warning that .

Clear ExamsPartial CreditTests May Not Match Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests that may not match study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Clear ExamsPartial CreditTests May Not Match Guides
“ and he was so helpful.”
CHEMB1B
“ and he gives partial credit.”
CHEMB1B
“the .”
B1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will be happy to answer your questions and can work with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“He will be happy to answer your questions and can work with .”

⚖️

45/100

“the material was not easy but and he gives partial credit.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Be prepared to work”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will be happy to answer your questions and can work with .
  • Lectures will leave you with more questions than answers
  • He talks for hours but doesnt ever get the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was a heavy class, but he made it fun.
  • the material was not easy but and he gives partial credit.
  • Read the book before you show up to lecture so that they make sense.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • !
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is detailed and spans years, but opinions are highly polarized and several reviews are older.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEMB1B6 reviews
B1A3 reviews
CHEMB1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1