AI Rate Professor

Industrial Design

Erasmo Salinas

CNST70451 · B12 · INDR12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want practical instruction and fair support, but be ready to focus, attend, and handle some workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnderstanding graderReal-world teachingHelpful and caringWork expectedAccent concern
  • Most reviews praise him as helpful, understanding, and connected to real industry practice.
  • The class is not effortless because students , and .
  • Online evidence is mixed, with one strong recommendation and one complaint about lectures, accent, and email response.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

A grades are common and grading sounds forgiving, but , and some technical preparation.

and late-work flexibility, while online reviews show both support and communication risk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is practical but can be challenging because it involves , and focused lectures.

Online reviews mention expected work and lecture difficulty, while and real-world applications.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Some reviews mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping hurts, while .

, while online evidence is split between no attendance requirement and mandatory participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and support, though online lecture clarity and communication reduce confidence.

, while online reviews are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students call him a and say he accepts late work when he sees effort.

Format shift

, while online reviews support understanding but are less specific.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is reasonable but not light, with , and measuring skills mentioned.

Format shift

Online reviews mention expected work, and and technical preparation.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students find him helpful, caring, practical, and inspiring, though one online review criticizes lecture delivery and email response.

Format shift

, while online reviews are mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Comments mention homework-linked tests, class review, projects, lectures, and practical work rather than a .

Format shift

In-person reviews give the clearest assessment details, while online reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing real-life applications, clear tests, late-work flexibility, and caring support.

Main concern

Students may struggle if and measuring skills.

What students said

“He applies everything to real life situations!”
CNST70451
“ .”
CNST70451
“STUDY math before entering this class , its heavily involves it .”
B12

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with one student calling him amazing and another criticizing boring lectures, accent clarity, and .

Main concern

Online lecture clarity and communication may vary by section.

What students said

“AMAZING instructor!! Definitely wants you to get the most out of the course and is always willing to go above and beyond to help!”
INDR12
“He's accent is very heavy and hard to understand.”
CNST70451

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but and based on homework, with no clear proof of proctoring or book policy.

Clear TestsHomework-Based TestsClass Review After Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and reviewed afterward, but does not clearly prove book or proctoring rules.

Clear TestsHomework-Based TestsClass Review After Tests
“ and all from the the answers together as a class.”
CNST70451

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to be successful in the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online delivery. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He applies everything to real life situations!”

⚖️

78/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“he expects you to do a bit of work, but it's not unreasonable”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He applies everything to real life situations!
  • Probably one of the most helpful and .
  • He's passionate about teaching drafting/cad

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • will accept late work as long as he sees you out in the effort
  • STUDY math before entering this class , its heavily involves it .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • AMAZING instructor!! Definitely wants you to get the most out of the course
  • He's accent is very heavy and hard to understand.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews are available, with mixed formats and limited assessment detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CNST704513 reviews
B121 review
INDR121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1