AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Li Kang Liu

COS126 · MATHB27 · MATHB60 · MATHB1A · MATHB1B · B70 · MATH70 · B6B · MATHB6A · B60 · MATHB70 · MATH60 · 83 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
19.51%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you are strong in , and comfortable with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkTest HeavyHard to FollowSelf-Study Required
  • Most students describe a very hard math class with and .
  • Teaching reviews are sharply polarized, but negative comments dominate and often say students must learn on their own.
  • A small group says she is caring and strong in math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

A few students earned A grades, but comments repeatedly , and strong test performance.

Online and in-person reviews both show high effort, with in-person evidence giving many more examples of and harsh tests.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students describe , and a need to already know the material.

content, while online reviews also describe the class as miserable and difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory or say skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

Both online reviews are marked mandatory, and that skipping class is risky.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students advise against taking her because the , and workload-heavy.

, while the two online reviews are also negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Many tags and comments call her a and tests.

Format shift

, while online reviews also say grades depend mainly on quizzes and tests.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students repeatedly describe daily or .

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, but and more frequent evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Some students praise her care and office hours, but , and self-teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly detailed and mostly negative, while online reviews are fewer but still negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews repeatedly say tests, quizzes, and while .

Format shift

Both formats support exam-heavy grading, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe , and exams that drive the grade.

Main concern

and put in .

What students said

“Be prepared to spend 12 hours a if .”
MATHB1B
“Tests and .”
MATHB1B
“The .”
MATHB60

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are , and grades based mainly on quizzes and tests.

Main concern

Online students still report heavy workload and high-stakes testing with .

What students said

“ UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE MISERABLE.”
MATHB1A
“the .”
MATHB1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and test-heavy, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyQuiz HeavyFinal Counts as Test GradeNo RetakesPolicy Not Fully Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or and final policies.

Test HeavyQuiz HeavyNo RetakesVery Hard Tests
“Tests and .”
MATHB1B
“ .”
MATHB1B
“ .”
MATHB1A

Online

Online reviews say the class is test and quiz based, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Quiz/Test BasedFinal Counts as Regular Test GradePolicy Not Clearly Proven
“the .”
MATHB1B
“The as a .”
MATHB1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you value your time and actually want to learn something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Awesome person but a terrible professor.”

⚖️

18/100

“Tests and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“Be prepared to spend 12 hours a if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome person but a terrible professor.
  • she hardly teaches.
  • .
  • Great at going over the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tests and .
  • The class average for every exam was around a 50% though, so maybe I'm just an outlier.
  • .
  • if you don't completely show every single step even if you have the correct answer.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Be prepared to spend 12 hours a if .
  • I spent 4 hours a and was still struggling.
  • Professor expects you to know everything from the start.
  • The .

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • Honesty she cares about her students.
  • Always open to help you when you're struggling.
  • , if u ask.
  • if you need it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

83

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years give detailed and consistent evidence of , and difficult teaching experiences.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 57
3 out of 59
2 out of 514
1 out of 542

Course coverage

B6B11 reviews
MATHB1A7 reviews
MATHB6A7 reviews
B606 reviews
MATHB1B6 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH603 reviews
MATH703 reviews
B702 reviews
MATHB702 reviews
COS1261 review
MATHB271 review
MATHB601 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 3

C range

7

C 5 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

17

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 3