AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sabrina Sherril

CHDVB22 · CHDVB20 · CHDVB42 · CHDV42 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

unless , and grading uncertainty on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveConfusing InstructionsLate GradingEasy WorkMixed Reputation
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, especially , and .
  • The course work is often described as easy, but the communication problems make grades feel risky.
  • , but they conflict sharply with newer complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The work itself is often easy and exists, but , and fairness complaints make the A less reliable.

Online reviews say easy work is undermined by confusion and , while an F with unfair grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Students repeatedly describe the class work as easy, with lectures, group projects, and .

Both formats support easy course content, but online students say confusing instructions make the experience harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory, and there is no strong evidence of .

Online and in-person counts both include mandatory attendance evidence, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recent students mainly warn against taking her because , and grades late or unfairly.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while and newer serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and easy work help, but , and an F review create major grade risk.

Format shift

Online reviews mention but also late or missing grading, while and harsh grading complaints.

Workload

Light

74/100

The workload is usually described as easy or not time-consuming, though .

Format shift

Online reviews say the workload is not heavy, while and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

The dominant recent pattern is poor communication, , and late responses despite some older positive reviews.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mostly poor, while and older positive reviews reduce confidence in a single trend.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mostly discuss assignments, group projects, feedback, grading, and .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on assignments and , while , and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with older praise for helpfulness but , and unprofessional follow-through.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent support and .

What students said

“ and doesn't provide feedback, she's not helpful at all , total waste of time.”
CHDVB22
“Overall easy class just lectures and a .”
CHDVB42
“ and the work doesn't feel hard or time consuming.”
CHDV42

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, saying the work is easy but , and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly say she does not answer questions clearly or on time.

What students said

“Professor was horrible at replying back to emails, when she did she was days late and her messages didn't make any sense.”
CHDVB22
“Work is easy but .”
CHDVB22
“She'll also grade your work late and .”
CHDVB22

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterms, finals, or other exam policies.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Work is easy but . She does not help you and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and conflicting time-based sentiment. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Communication Risk

25/100

“She does not help you and .”

📈 Course Easiness

82/100

“Overall easy class just lectures and a .”

⚖️

35/100

“She'll also grade your work late and .”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Communication

  • Professor was horrible at replying back to emails, when she did she was days late and her messages didn't make any sense.
  • She does not help you and .
  • and doesn't provide feedback, she's not helpful at all , total waste of time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Workload wasn't heavy weight at all.
  • Class is easy and she gives out a lot of .
  • Overall easy class just lectures and a .

Theme 3

🔀 About Mixed Experiences

  • Awesome teacher! looovvved her class. .
  • Professor Sabrina is AMAZING. I already took her twice.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews provide enough evidence and recent complaints are consistent, but .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHDVB224 reviews
CHDV421 review
CHDVB201 review
CHDVB421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values