AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Steve Teteak

ANTHB1 · ANTHB2 · ANTHRB2 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because workload and communication issues are reported.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerFunny In PersonHeavy Writing OnlineLenient GradingAttendance Helps
  • In-person students often praise his enthusiasm, humor, and fairness.
  • Online reviews are much weaker, citing poor communication, unclear instructions, heavy writing, and .
  • Grades can be fair or lenient, but workload and format matter a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

A strong grade is realistic because grading is often fair or lenient, but online workload and .

, while online evidence says the workload is much heavier.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course content is generally manageable, but writing volume, lecture pace, and online structure add difficulty.

In-person sections sound easier and more engaging, while online sections sound harder and less supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Some reviews say attendance is optional, but .

Online reviews mark attendance as optional, while in-person comments conflict and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but online complaints lower the overall recommendation.

; online evidence is mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students mention credit/no credit work, , late-work flexibility, and chances to raise grades.

Format shift

, while as fair but burdened by heavy work.

Workload

Moderate

49/100

Workload ranges from light in and short deadlines online.

Format shift

Online reviews strongly report heavy writing, while in-person reviews .

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

He is praised as passionate and funny in person, but online students report poor communication and .

Format shift

In-person teaching experience is strong, while online teaching experience is much weaker.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessments , and discussions.

Format shift

Online sections lean writing-heavy, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as passionate, funny, understanding, and often lenient.

Main concern

, and lecture pace can affect grades even when he is fair.

What students said

“Very enthusiastic professor! .”
ANTHB1
“His class isn't very hard as long as you show up and do the work; he is pretty lenient about late work as long as you communicate with him.”
ANTHB1
“ .”
ANTHB2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students report too much work and .

What students said

“I have emailed this professor with the email provided on his syllabus 5 times...no response.”
ANTHB1
“Overall he is a but too much work.”
ANTHB1
“His structure of the class was usually broken, with little to no feed back on many of the assignments.”
ANTHB1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exams, some multiple-choice exams, and some easy quiz or study-guide support.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalMultiple Choice MidtermMultiple Choice FinalEasy QuizzesStudy Guide Matches Final

Assessment risk

Varies

69/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

section, multiple-choice midterm and final in another, and a study guide matching the final.

Essay MidtermEssay FinalMultiple Choice MidtermMultiple Choice FinalStudy Guide Matches Final
“The only downside is that the midterm and , but he gives you a couple weeks to work on them.”
ANTHB1
“Study guide for as the final.”
ANTHB2
“We had a few homework assignments, 1 midterm (multiple choice) & 1 final (multiple choice).”
ANTHB2

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy structure and many essays or short-answer tasks, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, midterm format, or .

Test HeavyEssaysShort Answer Questions
“For a summer session class this professor made his students do 2 essays and a few short answer questions twice in a row, with only three days notice.”
ANTHB1
“Lots of homework, So ”
ANTHB1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class isn't very hard as long as you show up and do the work; he is pretty lenient about late work as long as you communicate with him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting separate online and , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

75/100

“Very enthusiastic professor! .”

⚖️

76/100

“A lot of his work was credit/no credit, and he isn't a .”

📚 Workload Risk

49/100

“Overall he is a but too much work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very enthusiastic professor! .
  • Mr. Teteak is very passionate and knowledgeable when it comes to Anthropology.
  • , and funny!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • A lot of his work was credit/no credit, and he isn't a .
  • and even gave many chances to raise our grades.
  • His class isn't very hard as long as you show up and do the work

Theme 3

🧑‍💻 About Online Experience

  • I have emailed this professor with the email provided on his syllabus 5 times...no response.
  • and I can't contact him for feedback...super frustrating.
  • Skip if if you're confident.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 11 recent reviews give useful detail, but online and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHB16 reviews
ANTHB24 reviews
ANTHRB21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1