AI Rate Professor

English

Theresa McCarron

ENGL50 · ENGB1A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Consider her if and writing work, but do not treat the class as a guaranteed easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful InstructorMixed WorkloadLots of ReadingTough Grading RiskStrong Support
  • Most comments are positive, but and grading.
  • The course can feel easy if students keep up with reading, but workload risk is real.
  • Evidence is thin and partly old, so confidence should be cautious.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The class may be manageable with reading, but and a C report prevent calling it an easy A.

Online evidence is too thin, while if prepared and lot of work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course content seems manageable for prepared students but reading and writing demands can raise difficulty.

The online review gives little detail, while and difficult experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

The online review and one in-person review, with other reviews unclear.

Online evidence says mandatory, and in-person evidence is mixed because .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Positive comments outweigh the negative one, but the recommendation signal is mixed and based on few reviews.

The online review is positive, while not take again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One review calls her a , while other comments suggest effort and .

Format shift

Online grading evidence is absent, while and manageable grading experiences.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, and papers, though one says it is manageable if you keep up.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is too short to judge, while .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most comments describe her as , and effective, but one old review is very negative.

Format shift

The online review is positive but shallow, while but mostly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments mention reading, homework, papers, and .

Format shift

and writing than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one negative review about heavy work and tough grading.

Main concern

Reading, homework, papers, and .

What students said

“Lot of work”
ENGL50
“But if you do the .”
ENGL50

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is strongly positive but too .

Main concern

The evidence is very limited because the review only says she is great.

What students said

“10/10 great professor”
ENGB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book policy, or final exam rules.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“But if you do the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and mixed recommendation signals. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She provides a great learning atmosphere.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

62/100

“ . :)”

⚖️ Workload Risk

34/100

“Lot of work”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • 10/10 great professor
  • She provides help before class and is awesome at answering e-mails, even on weekends.
  • She provides a great learning atmosphere.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lot of work
  • LOTS of .
  • But if you do the .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • SO MANY PAPERS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and the opinions conflict sharply.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGB1A2 reviews
ENGL502 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values