AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Michael Richards

ARTB2 · ARTB6 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle critique and uncertainty in .

Best fit · Effort For RewardSubjective gradingConstructive critiqueParticipation mattersPolarizing feedbackMandatory attendance
  • Reviews agree critique and .
  • Students disagree sharply on whether his critique style is constructive or rude.
  • because multiple reviews say art is graded by personal preference.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Grades are not impossible, but and mixed critique experiences make an A feel uncertain rather than easy.

Online reviews split between fair constructive feedback and harsh subjective grading, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The course content itself sounds manageable, but critique standards and .

Online and and more to subjective evaluation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value his critique style or and .

Online reviews are directly conflicting, while the but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

because multiple students say he grades based on what he personally likes.

Format shift

Both formats include subjective grading concerns, with online evidence more polarized.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The reviews focus on critique and , so workload appears moderate but not well documented.

Format shift

Neither format gives strong workload details beyond participation and critique.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some , but others report rude critique and .

Format shift

Online reviews are polarized, while the but subjective in grading.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears , and improvement rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats support assignment and critique-based assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but grades based on what he likes.

Main concern

In-person evidence is too limited and critique.

What students said

“He grade you based on what he likes.”
ARTB2

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews conflict sharply, with and another describing rude critique and .

Main concern

The online experience may depend .

What students said

“ and how your work could be improved.”
ARTB6
“He would also be really rude to students during critique and even demeaned one student until they cried.”
ARTB6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exams, proctoring, webcam use, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam policy, proctoring, webcam use, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. would grade art based on whether he liked it and not based on if students were learning/improving.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ and how your work could be improved.”

⚖️

30/100

“He grade you based on what he likes.”

👍 Recommendation Level

58/100

“I'm excited to enroll in his Acrylic Painting II class.”

Theme 1

🎨 About Critique

  • .
  • and how your work could be improved.
  • He would also be really rude to students during critique and even demeaned one student until they cried.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • He grade you based on what he likes.
  • Prof. would grade art based on whether he liked it and not based on if students were learning/improving.

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • I'm excited to enroll in his Acrylic Painting II class.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, and the opinions conflict strongly, so confidence is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ARTB62 reviews
ARTB21 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values