AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Aaron Nance

COMPB10 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful when askedLecture-heavySelf-study neededLimited office hoursFair grading
  • Students describe him as helpful and .
  • The course , and student self-study.
  • Reviews are mixed because support exists but hands-on learning and office hours feel limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades are achievable, but students say the , and self-study.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Intro computer science was not described as impossible, but reading and limited hands-on practice made it challenging for some students.

All evidence comes from in-person COMPB10 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

and two say it was mandatory, so the policy appears inconsistent by section.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it conflicts across reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

because he helps when asked, but the lecture-heavy format limits enthusiasm.

All recommendation evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Students mention and , but not an automatic A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload appears manageable but , and independent effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Students find him helpful, but several say the class is lecture-heavy, boring, or lacking hands-on learning.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and , with no single method fully dominating.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is from in-person COMPB10 reviews, where students describe a lecture-heavy class with fair help when stuck.

Main concern

Students wanted more hands-on learning and .

What students said

“The class takes some effort on your part.”
COMPB10
“Mostly lecture in class. Not enough hands-on learning.”
COMPB10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review tags the course as test-heavy, but comments .

Test Heavy MentionedExtra CreditPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Test Heavy MentionedExtra Credit
“ ”
COMPB10
“Get ready to read, Lecture heavy, ”
COMPB10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class takes some effort on your part.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and limited support access. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Great guy. Very helpful. Class subject was boring. But he was cool.”

📚

50/100

“ and skimming what I was confused about afterward really helped.”

⚖️

66/100

“ and grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great guy. Very helpful.
  • Mostly lecture in class.
  • Not enough hands-on learning.

Theme 2

📈 About Effort & Grades

  • The class takes some effort on your part.
  • and skimming what I was confused about afterward really helped.
  • and grades fairly.

Theme 3

🕒 About Support Access

  • If .
  • He does help when you are stuck, but has limited office hours due working full time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews are available, so patterns are useful but not strong enough for high confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMPB104 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values