AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Natalie Thompson

ANTH310 · ANTHR101 · ANTH100 · ANTH120 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and can keep up with reading, writing, and deadlines.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturerHelpful InstructorInteresting ClassStrict but Fair GradingExtra Credit Available
  • Most in-person reviews describe clear, helpful teaching with relatable examples.
  • ANTH120 can require serious reading and long notes, especially in critical thinking sections.
  • Online evidence is mixed, with one strict late-work complaint and one fair but writing-heavy review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A seems achievable with steady work, but , and deadlines prevent it from being a low-effort class.

Online evidence is stricter, while and clearer study guidance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

The content is usually manageable when students pay attention, but ANTH120 can become hard because of reading and critical thinking demands.

, while online reviews focus more on restrictions and writing effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

, but most reviews do not clearly state the attendance policy.

; in-person evidence does not clearly prove a policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and helpful support, though online strictness and workload create some caution.

, while online reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students describe grading as strict but fair, with and one note that good grades are achievable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention stricter grading more directly, while and study guidance.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is moderate overall, but some ANTH120 sections require long notes and heavy outside reading.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize writing and deadline pressure, while and notes.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most , and enjoyable despite some course difficulty.

Format shift

, while online feedback is split between support and strictness.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and , so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on assignments and writing, while in-person , and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive and , and helpful study guidance.

Main concern

Some sections , and steady studying.

What students said

“She makes this course enjoyable by using examples we can relate to.”
ANTH120
“She provides info on what to study for midterm and final, and also gives a ton of !”
ANTHR101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with one harsh late-work experience and one fair but writing-heavy positive review.

Main concern

and missed-work rules can hurt students who fall behind.

What students said

“Does not let you make up any work even if your a late start”
ANTH120
“ but also was fair and a good grade is absolutely achievable.”
ANTH310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Midterm And Final MentionedStudy Guidance ProvidedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and but do not clearly prove exam format rules.

Midterm And Final MentionedStudy Guidance Provided
“She provides info on what to study for midterm and final”
ANTHR101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She totally connects to the class in a way that I haven't seen in other profs do, she is great in and comparing theories to everyday examples!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She makes this course enjoyable by using examples we can relate to.”

⚖️

48/100

“ but also was fair and a good grade is absolutely achievable.”

📚 Difficulty And Work

57/100

“the material was very hard & took a lot of reading outside of class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a .
  • she is great in and comparing theories to everyday examples!
  • She makes this course enjoyable by using examples we can relate to.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • It is not a hard class as long as you pay attention to lectures and read the assigned readings.
  • the material was very hard & took a lot of reading outside of class.
  • also gives a ton of !

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Strictness

  • Does not let you make up any work even if your a late start
  • the restrictions on Black Board were frustrating
  • but also was fair

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews give useful detail across formats, but several are old and grade data is limited.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTH1203 reviews
ANTHR1012 reviews
ANTH1001 review
ANTH3101 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values