AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Quinn Dimaya-Thurley

PHILB9 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can handle vague grading and a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized ClassVague GradingTough GraderMany PapersNot Recommended
  • The only review is strongly negative and says the class was disorganized.
  • The student earned an A, but still criticized vague and .
  • items.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

The student got an A, but , and vague feedback make the A feel costly rather than easy.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course appears challenging mainly because of disorganization, papers, and .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The student directly and wished they had taken the course with someone else.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

20/100

The review tags him as a and and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The tags describe many papers and and high-stakes workload.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The only student describes the class as disorganized and .

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The and few graded items rather than exams.

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is negative and , and poor recommendation value.

Main concern

Students may struggle with and little useful structure.

What students said

“ .”
PHIL-B9
“ and unhelpful.”
PHIL-B9

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove exam .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . and unhelpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

20/100

“ and unhelpful.”

👎 Recommendation Level

20/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • I wish I had taken PHIL-B9 with another professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and unhelpful.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review exists, so the signal is useful but not stable enough for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL-B91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values