AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sukhdeep Sunner

MATHB1A · MATHB70 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if , and tolerate strict grading and uneven explanations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHomework HeavyTest HeavyStrictInconsistent Teaching
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students finding her caring and .
  • Getting a , and reviewing lecture examples.
  • The , and heavy homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A grades are possible, but comments show students must attend, practice heavily, complete homework, and .

Online evidence is negative and difficult, while but and practice are necessary.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Math concepts become harder because several students report , skimmed explanations, and test-heavy pacing.

Online evidence reports errors and poor support, while and confusing lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory or say skipping class makes passing unlikely.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendations are split because some students value her help, while and .

Online evidence is negative, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Repeated tough-grader tags and outcomes.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and lecture-heavy work.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, with online adding frustration about flawed lecture videos.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with caring support in some reviews and .

Format shift

Online evidence is clearly negative, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments repeatedly mention exams, tests, quizzes, homework practice, and .

Format shift

Online and in-person evidence both mention tests or quizzes, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with caring support in some classes but , and tests.

Main concern

Students must attend, practice, and .

What students said

“Lecture material and to wanting a good score on the exams.”
MATHB1A
“She never went in depth and really taught the lesson, she just skimmed through it.”
MATHB1A
“ if you know it already then itll be easier to understand.”
MATHB70

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative, citing mistakes, , and .

Main concern

The and unreliable answers.

What students said

“ and every lecture video she would get through a problem halfway and find a mistake she made.”
MATHB1A
“Don't trust the answers she gives.”
MATHB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear important, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, closed-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Test HeavyQuizzesSimilar Examples Before TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Or Book Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and similar examples before tests, but they do not clearly prove book policy or .

Test HeavyPop QuizzesSimilar Examples Before Tests
“She would give you tests and and expects you to understand it.”
MATHB1A
“She gives you very similar examples before the test so you can review.”
MATHB70

Online

The , and tough grading, but it does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Test Heavy
“Lots of ”
MATHB1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She never went in depth and really taught the lesson, she just skimmed through it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ if you know it already then itll be easier to understand.”

📈 Grade Effort

42/100

“ and review and you will pass.”

⚖️

28/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Sunner was great! She really wants the and is always willing to help whenever needed.
  • She never went in depth and really taught the lesson, she just skimmed through it.
  • if you know it already then itll be easier to understand.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Tests

  • Lecture material and to wanting a good score on the exams.
  • She would give you tests and and expects you to understand it.
  • Lots of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • .
  • Don't trust the answers she gives.
  • She is very strict and also .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years show a consistent split between caring support and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATHB1A4 reviews
MATHB703 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values