AI Rate Professor

History

Leah Avila

HISTB20B · HISTB20A · HISTB7A · HISTB18 · HISTB17A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if and writing for a very fair shot at a high grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit HeavyAssignment HeavyAmazing LecturesClear GradingLots of Reading
  • Avila is strongly recommended because , and accessibility.
  • Getting an A is very realistic due to and , but students must keep up with heavy weekly work.
  • Online and in-person reviews both mention workload, while and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

A high grade is very reachable because of and clear grading, but , and weekly work.

Online reviews emphasize and A outcomes, while if students do the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is not conceptually punishing, but the , and writing-heavy.

Both formats show workload pressure; in-person comments add long lectures, notes, and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, and in-person comments say participation is needed for full credit.

Online attendance is mixed but often marked mandatory; and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Most students recommend her because , and extra credit is generous.

Online reviews are highly positive overall, while because of workload.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

is repeatedly described as abundant, and students report very high .

Format shift

Both formats support generous grading, with in-person evidence explicitly saying tests are open book and is plentiful.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and projects.

Format shift

Online workload is weekly and assignment-heavy; , and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students , and communication despite the workload.

Format shift

Online comments are especially strong on organization and accessibility, while and feedback.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears , and finals rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and assignments; , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews report long lectures, many , and generous .

Main concern

, and write a lot.

What students said

“Shes hard for the lazy, do the work easy A!”
HISTB17A
“you will be writing a LOT of them”
HISTB7A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise clear structure, strong lectures, , and a .

Main concern

The workload is steady, with , and projects.

What students said

“So, an .”
HISTB20B
“There is no reason to fail or get below an A.”
HISTB20A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The allow notes, making exam risk relatively student-friendly despite workload.

Open Book TestsNotes AllowedWeekly QuizzesMidterm And Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly support open-book or and final.

Open Book TestsNotes AllowedMidterm And Final
“Its .”
HISTB17A
“you can use them on the .”
HISTB7A

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes but do not clearly .

Weekly QuizzesExam policy otherwise not clearly stated
“Assignments each week included 2 annotations for lecture notes or a documentary and , and a quiz.”
HISTB20B
“Gives a weekly test and discussion.”
HISTB18

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes hard for the lazy, do the work easy A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Her passion for her craft was infectious and her lectures were so well prepped and correlated to the material perfectly.”

🎁

90/100

“She gives out like candy.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“So, an .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor, would recommend, gives out (lots), she gives lots of feedback and is astonishingly great at lectures.
  • Professor was passionate and organized!
  • Great professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is no reason to fail or get below an A.
  • I ended with a 110%.
  • Shes hard for the lazy, do the work easy A!

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • So, an .
  • Expect a lot of homework
  • you will be writing a LOT of them

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews across 2019 to 2026 are consistent about strong teaching, heavy workload, and generous .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HISTB17A2 reviews
HISTB20A2 reviews
HISTB181 review
HISTB20B1 review
HISTB7A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values