AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Kendall Moya

PHILB6 · PHILB9 · PHILB7 · PHILB6A · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
47.83%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding philosophy course and and a polarizing classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy ReadingPop QuizzesCaring But PolarizingHard Work Required
  • Students , and tough grading.
  • , and willingness to help committed students.
  • , and poor fit for online classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A grades are possible, but comments repeatedly , and self-study.

Online reviews make the A feel harder because grading and instructions are criticized more strongly.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The philosophy content is repeatedly described as hard, reading-heavy, and difficult to understand without effort.

Both formats are challenging, while online reviews .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Most reviews with , even when one online review says it was not mandatory.

, while online evidence is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Students recommend her when they value challenge and feedback, but and polarizing style.

In-person reviews are split, while online reviews trend much more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many reviews call her a and describe C-or-below outcomes despite following instructions.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online students .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and self-study.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy workload, though , and exams.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She can be caring, funny, and helpful, but and embarrassing comments.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is polarized, while online teaching evidence is mostly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and exams rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

, and homework, while online reviews mainly mention assignments and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

engaged students and strong criticism from students who felt embarrassed or unsupported.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and .

What students said

“Be ready to spend many hours self studying and practicing the material outside of class.”
PHILB7
“You need to put in work to pass this class. .”
PHILB9

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are , and low compassion.

Main concern

and harsh grading.

What students said

“She doesnt give clear instructions about what she wants from the assignments and grades hard!”
PHILB9
“Please run and never look her way.”
PHILB9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews prove quizzes, essays, and exams, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Pop QuizzesEssay ExamsScantron ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and scantron exams, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Pop QuizzesEssay ExamsScantron Exams
“the exams require 4 essays each a page long.”
PHILB6
“All of the exams and ”
PHILB7

Online

Online reviews mention test-heavy structure but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Test Heavy
“ ”
PHILB9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You need to put in work to pass this class. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She is the sweetest lady once you actually do your work and show you want to pass.”

⚖️

24/100

“She is vague about her teaching material and .”

📚 Workload

24/100

“Be ready to spend many hours self studying and practicing the material outside of class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Moya is by far one of .
  • Doesn't teach into depth because she gets off topic pretty quick.
  • have.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You need to put in work to pass this class. .
  • The course material is definitely hard but Moya made the course very easy to understand.
  • There are a lot of HW and 3 essays.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • Please run and never look her way.
  • I had all A's on my work but I dropped because .
  • She does jokingly pick on students but it's all in good fun and not serious.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 23 reviews across several years, both formats, and , and teaching style.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PHILB711 reviews
PHILB910 reviews
PHILB61 review
PHILB6A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2