AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Viviano Aguilar

PHILB9 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take Viviano Aguilar if you want a supportive online writing-heavy philosophy course with and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear grading criteriaStrong feedbackManageable essaysOnline savvy
  • Students consistently describe him as , and easy to reach.
  • Grades are strong, but students still need to .
  • All evidence comes from online PHILB9 reviews, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A looks very realistic if students complete the and follow the prompts.

in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course is not conceptually hard, but it requires steady critical-thinking writing.

Only online reviews describe the course, and they call lectures easy to follow.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Some reviews mark attendance as mandatory, while one .

and somewhat incomplete.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and praises his kindness, clarity, and feedback.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Grades are high and students say prompts, criteria, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The workload is manageable but centered on several long essays, including a final paper around 3000 words.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is online only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Reviews describe papers and essays as the core assessments, with .

Format shift

Online reviews mention writing assignments, and there is no in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly positive, with , and easy access to the professor.

Main concern

The main cost is writing several 2000 to 3000 word papers.

What students said

“Total of 3 assignments which are 3 papers you'll write and he gives you the prompt.”
PHILB9
“The work load is very manageable and .”
PHILB9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, open-book rule, midterm, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention papers but do not clearly prove an .

Writing PapersNo Clear Exam Policy
“Final paper is 3000 words.”
PHILB9

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The work load is very manageable and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, writing workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Lectures are easy to follow.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ !”

⚖️

84/100

“He returns them on time and give good feedbacks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are easy to follow.
  • and easy to get ahold of.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Total of 3 assignments which are 3 papers you'll write and he gives you the prompt.
  • The as you need a 2k-3k word count and he gives you the writing prompt.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent, detailed, and all recent enough to support a .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILB93 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values