AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Alixis Rhodes

PSYCH74497 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you and delayed support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow Email ResponseConfusing InstructionsHeavy ReadingLots of Homework
  • Most comments describe poor communication and .
  • an A easy.
  • The overall evidence is negative despite one strong positive review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, but other comments describe unclear instructions, grade deductions, and heavy work.

Online evidence is negative and uncertain, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students describe the course as challenging, stressful, reading-heavy, and assignment-heavy.

Both formats point to difficulty, though .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One online review says attendance was not mandatory, while the .

Online evidence supports flexibility, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most comments do not recommend her because communication is slow and .

The only online review is negative, and the in-person-labeled reviews are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

One student reports grade deductions for .

Format shift

and the strict grading complaint; online evidence lacks a final grade.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly workload-heavy, and and homework tags.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students mainly criticize , and poor support.

Format shift

Online evidence is clearly poor, while but includes serious support complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on Canvas assignments, papers, discussions, and .

Format shift

Both formats describe assignment-driven work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The made the class easy and another warning against poor online-style support.

Main concern

Inconsistent support and .

What students said

“If you follow the canvas and syllabus by just handing in your work you will get A.”
PSYCH74497
“ assignments or questions.”
PSYCH74497

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online and syllabus alignment, slow emails, and no course meetings.

Main concern

Poor communication and assignment confusion.

What students said

“There are five-day delays for emails.”
PSYCH74497
“ and Syllabus regarding course assignments.”
PSYCH74497

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove a .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or proctoring policy.

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ assignments or questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ assignments or questions.”

⚖️

30/100

“Doesnt even mention what needs to be included in the .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“There are five-day delays for emails.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Communication

  • There are five-day delays for emails.
  • assignments or questions.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • and Syllabus regarding course assignments.
  • She adds unnecessary stress to a challenging course.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • If you follow the canvas and syllabus by just handing in your work you will get A.
  • Doesnt even mention what needs to be included in the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews are available, opinions conflict, and some course format labels do not match the comment text.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH744973 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1