AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Janet Tarjan

MATHB60 · B1A · B4A · MATHB22 · MATHB1A · B70 · B6A · B6B · MATHB4A · MATHB6A · MATHB70 · CALC2 · CALCB1B · MATHB6B · B50 · 116 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math under a heavy workload and strict class expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkLecture HeavyTough GraderPoor Time ManagementSelf Teaching Required
  • Most students describe poor organization, tangents, and heavy self-teaching.
  • Workload is repeatedly described as excessive, with , and long tests.
  • A few students call her caring and helpful, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

22/100

An A is possible for some students, but most comments describe heavy self-teaching, strict formatting demands, and high effort.

Both Online and In person evidence show high effort, with In person reviews giving more examples of failed or dropped outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course feels difficult because lectures are scattered, pacing is poor, and students often must teach themselves.

Online and In and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

as mandatory and say she calls out lateness, absences, or early departures.

Both formats show attendance pressure, with In person reviews giving the strongest behavioral examples.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students do not recommend her because the workload , and .

Online reviews are uniformly negative, while In person reviews include a few positive outliers but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

because students report picky , and limited grade flexibility.

Format shift

Both formats mention strict grading, with Online .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The workload is overwhelming, with repeated reports of , and multiple daily assignments.

Format shift

Both formats strongly report heavy workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students often describe her as kind or knowledgeable, but say her teaching is scattered, off-topic, and .

Format shift

Online reviews are more consistently negative, while In person reviews include a .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment seems mixed across homework, labs, notes, tests, and class participation, though .

Format shift

and tests, but In person reviews , and binders.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews mostly describe a caring but up, and tests feel hard.

Main concern

The main risk is poor structure combined with and .

What students said

“STAY AWAY AND !”
B4A
“I taught myself everything.”
B1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly , and strict grading style.

Main concern

Students say the online format still requires self-teaching and large amounts of work.

What students said

“i feel like i'm teaching myself a math class.”
B70
“ .”
MATHB70

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard and poorly supported by homework, but reviews .

Test HeavyHard TestsHomework-Based TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Hard TestsLong TestsHomework-Based TestsTest Heavy
“The tests.”
B4A
“ .”
B6B

Online

and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Strict Grading StyleHomework HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“things have to be done HER EXACT WAY or it's wrong.”
B70

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the class is a mess. Very bad on time management she ends up explaining way over what we are actually learning and always goes over on time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She is all over the place so don't expect much outside help from her.”

⚠️ Workload Pressure

10/100

“She drowns you in homework.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“I would . I taught myself everything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gets off topic too much.
  • Has trouble communicating the information to the students.
  • She is smart and kind but felt useless to me as a professor.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • you will have SO .
  • She drowns you in homework.
  • There as well.

Theme 3

🧪

  • The tests.
  • .
  • and the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

116

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years repeatedly describe the same problems with workload, organization, and self-teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 514
3 out of 515
2 out of 530
1 out of 542

Course coverage

B1A9 reviews
MATHB1A8 reviews
B6B5 reviews
MATHB6B5 reviews
B4A4 reviews
Show 11 more courses
B704 reviews
MATHB6A4 reviews
MATHB703 reviews
714751 review
B501 review
B6A1 review
CALC21 review
CALCB1B1 review
MATHB221 review
MATHB4A1 review
MATHB601 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 1 · B 9

C range

2

C 2

D range

3

D+ 1 · D- 2

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 1