AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Baochi Nguyen

MATHD · MATH280 · MATHBA · MATHMATH · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her only if and , and practice tests to protect your grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkDisorganized pacingExtra creditExam practice helpsMixed teaching clarity
  • , but tests often mirror homework or .
  • Teaching quality is sharply mixed, with .
  • and , but the class is not a low-effort easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades are reachable because of and exam predictability, but repeated homework and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The math content is manageable when homework matches tests, but fast pacing and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

The only explicit attendance reports say attendance was not mandatory, with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

work around weak lectures and disorganization.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

, note cards, and , but several students still describe the course as difficult.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A , but most negative reviews cite unclear, rushed, or unhelpful teaching.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and practice-test style exams rather than one single method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , but also unclear teaching, disorganization, and heavy homework.

Main concern

The main risk is confusing instruction combined with a lot of homework.

What students said

“ life, not exaggerating.”
MATH280
“Lots of homework, but what's on the .”
MATHD
“She clearly tells you what will be on the exams and .”
MATHMATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly because comments mention , and homework-based questions.

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsNote Cards AllowedHomework-Based Exam QuestionsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sometimes allow note cards, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policy.

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsNote Cards AllowedHomework-Based Exam Questions
“She clearly tells you what will be on the exams and .”
MATHMATH
“lets you ”
MATHD
“pretty much all of the .”
MATHD

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're mainly trying to get credits, she's a good choice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She goes too fast without teaching anything and is extremely insufficient with her time.”

📈 Grade Path

58/100

“She clearly tells you what will be on the exams and .”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Lots of homework, but what's on the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her .
  • She has clarity issues when speaking.
  • understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A in the class but it took until the last day of class to pull off.
  • It's not that hard to get a decent grade.
  • She offers a good bit of .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk

  • stay away from this profesor
  • RUN!
  • If costs.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews give useful patterns, but several are old and the tone is highly polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATHBA2 reviews
MATHD2 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
MATH2801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values