AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Rebecca Ogaz

PSYCHB5 · PSYCB1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
7/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are prepared to teach yourself and accept strict deadlines with little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo lectures or notesLate gradingStrict deadlinesTough graderPoor support
  • All reviews are negative and every provided .
  • Students report missing lectures, notes, PowerPoints, and grade updates, making the class feel unsupported.
  • The class may use publisher-based online learning, but grading and deadlines are described as harsh and inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Passing is possible, but , and students needing to work hard without support.

All evidence comes from online reviews because there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course feels difficult mainly because students lack lectures, notes, grade updates, and help rather than because the content is clearly advanced.

All course difficulty evidence comes from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

saying no and another saying yes, so flexibility is unclear.

, and they conflict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

4/100

Students strongly warn against taking her because they felt unsupported, harshly graded, and left to manage the course alone.

All recommendation evidence is online and consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students describe tough grading, strict deadlines, missing grade entry, and little compassion.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

The workload is made heavier , and limited instructor materials.

Format shift

Only online reviews describe workload conditions.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students report no useful lectures, notes, PowerPoints, grade management, or meaningful help.

Format shift

Only online reviews describe teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Reviews mention online publisher testing, grades, deadlines, and course work, but do not clearly show a .

Format shift

Only online reviews mention assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe severe lack of teaching presence, missing grades, strict deadlines, and .

Main concern

The main online concern is having little real instructor support while and deadlines.

What students said

“All learning and testing was done through the online textbook publisher's site”
PSYCB1A
“she hasn't posted any notes,lectures or PowerPoints”
PSYCHB5
“a very tough instructor and ”
PSYCB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Testing appears to occur through an online textbook publisher site, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Online Textbook Publisher TestingReviews Do Not Clearly Prove ProctoringReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Open Book

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews state testing used the textbook publisher site, but they do not clearly prove webcam, .

Online Textbook Publisher TestingReviews Do Not Clearly Prove ProctoringReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Open Book
“All learning and testing was done through the online textbook publisher's site”
PSYCB1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“its like we don't have a professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student warnings. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“she hasn't posted any notes,lectures or PowerPoints”

⚖️

12/100

“she hasn't entered ANY grades at all!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

4/100

“DO !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • All learning and testing was done through the online textbook publisher's site
  • she hasn't posted any notes,lectures or PowerPoints
  • is no help at all

Theme 2

⚖️ And Deadlines

  • she asked the students to keep track of their own grades
  • Very strict about deadlines to students
  • a very tough instructor and

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • DO !
  • I am surprised I passed this class and I really tried my hardest.
  • I am really considering my major due to the difficulty of this course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent, detailed, and all strongly negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCB1A2 reviews
PSYCHB51 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values