AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Amaka Donn

POLS71438 · 71434B1 · POLS101 · POLSB11 · C71434 · ENGLO99 · POLSB1 · POLSB107 · POLSCI101 · COS126ECON238 · POLSB171438 · POLS1 · POLSB111 · CRN71434 · POLISCI71434 · POLS71434 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend, participate, and read, but if you need very slow and detailed lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation mattersReading requiredCaring and passionateLecture-heavyAccent can be hard
  • Students often describe Donn as caring, passionate, funny, and knowledgeable.
  • , and keeping up with assignments.
  • The main recurring concern is that lectures can be fast or hard to understand, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Good grades are reachable through attendance, reading, participation, and assignments, with helping some students.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

The course content is manageable, but students must read because lectures can be fast, superficial, or .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory or say participation and showing up are essential.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and engaging teaching, but some warn that lecture clarity and test preparation can be weak.

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

Several reviews , and a teacher who wants students to pass.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format comparison is available.

Workload

Moderate

61/100

Work is usually manageable, but , and group work appear often.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format comparison is available.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students often praise her passion, care, humor, and subject knowledge, while repeatedly noting accent and pacing issues.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format comparison is available.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention tests, reading, , and rather than one single grade source.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format comparison is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All reviews are in person and show a participation-heavy class with manageable work but mixed lecture clarity.

Main concern

Students need to read and participate because lectures can move quickly or be hard to understand.

What students said

“If you pay attention do the reading and do the good grade.”
POLSB1
“Her accent at times makes it very difficult to understand what she is saying”
POLSB1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and preparation concerns, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules, open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Tests MentionedNo Study Guide ComplaintReading-Based PreparationExtra Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

54/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study preparation, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

TestsNo Study Guide ComplaintStudy Before Test
“ because her lectures are bad and she does not give out study guides.”
POLSB1
“I appreciated you helping the class study for a .”
CRN71434

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Donn is very fair and knows alot about political science.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She genuinely cares about her students learning and shows it daily, rain or shine.”

📚 Reading Required

57/100

“ very important to passing the class.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ learn about Political Science.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable of the subject!
  • she shows an intense passion for the subject
  • She brings real world experiences into her lecture.

Theme 2

📚 Work and Participation

  • Participation and .
  • Always read your textbook.

Theme 3

⚠️ Main Concerns

  • Her speech was extremely hard to understand at some times.
  • She goes through notes so fast so
  • hw is ok but because her lectures are bad

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 40 reviews, but many are clustered around 2016 and several are short, which lowers confidence.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 511
3 out of 510
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLSB122 reviews
POLSB1073 reviews
POLS12 reviews
71434B11 review
C714341 review
Show 11 more courses
COS126ECON2381 review
CRN714341 review
ENGLO991 review
POLISCI714341 review
POLS1011 review
POLS714341 review
POLS714381 review
POLSB111 review
POLSB1111 review
POLSB1714381 review
POLSCI1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Not sure yet 8