AI Rate Professor

Journalism

John Harte

JRNLB15 · COMM2020 · JRNLB1 · COMM274 · B1 · JRNLB16 · PHOTOGRAPHY · B2 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Harte is a strong choice if you want an engaging journalism class with supportive teaching and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing LecturesCaringEngagingEasy AReal-World Journalism
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Harte as engaging, caring, funny, and highly knowledgeable in journalism.
  • Grades are usually friendly when students show up, complete assignments, and pay attention.
  • Older negative reviews criticize structure and technical depth, but recent reviews are strongly positive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Many students report A grades and say passing is easy if , and complete a small number of assignments.

Online evidence is only one positive review, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course experience is generally approachable because , and difficulty is usually low to moderate.

Both formats are positive, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but students frame it as useful rather than punitive.

The online review marks attendance mandatory, while main requirement.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Students repeatedly call him a must-take professor because , and practical.

The online review is strongly positive, and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students frequently earned A grades and , and helpful exam preparation.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews provide repeated A outcomes.

Workload

Light

80/100

Several reviews mention only a few assignments, manageable exams, no textbook, or and notes.

Format shift

; online evidence does not clearly describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Most students , and professional journalism experience.

Format shift

Both formats are positive, with .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention projects, assignments, a midterm, a final, and .

Format shift

; online reviews do not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mostly very positive, with students praising his lectures, support, real-world experience, and manageable assignments.

Main concern

A few older reviews say some classes were boring, loose, or weak on technical instruction.

What students said

“Harte has amazing lectures and really keeps you engaged and interested, he is a !”
JRNLB1
“Just show up to class and takes notes.”
COMM2020
“He only gave a midterm and a final.”
COMM274

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is highly , and engaging style.

Main concern

The online sample is too small to confirm format-specific patterns.

What students said

“He is really good at teaching and explaining the material as well as keeping it entertaining and fun.”
JRNLB1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support a student-friendly exam setup with lecture-based tests and advance guidance, but they .

Lecture-Based TestsMidterm And FinalFew AssignmentsExam Heads-Up

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam heads-up, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Midterm And FinalLecture-Based TestsExam Heads-Up
“He only gave a midterm and a final.”
COMM274
“He even gives you a heads up for exams.”
COMM2020

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Harte has amazing lectures and really keeps you engaged and interested, he is a !”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is really good at teaching and explaining the material as well as keeping it entertaining and fun.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

95/100

“Harte has amazing lectures and really keeps you engaged and interested, he is a !”

📈 Grade Friendliness

88/100

“If anyone doesn't pass it's honestly their fault!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are cool and he tries to make the most out of every class.
  • He is really knowledgeable on his field.
  • The lectures and by step.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Just show up to class and takes notes.
  • He only gave a midterm and a final.
  • do all assignments (only 3) and don't miss lecture (Tuesdays).

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Professor Harte is such a sweet man.
  • Very respectful and professional.
  • He is willing to help with anything and is just great.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews provide useful evidence, but only one online review and several older comments reduce certainty.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

JRNLB157 reviews
JRNLB13 reviews
JRNLB163 reviews
B11 review
B21 review
Show 3 more courses
COMM20201 review
COMM2741 review
PHOTOGRAPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 11

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1