AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

William Daniel

CHEMB1A · B1A · CHEMB1B · GENCHEM · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are strong in chemistry and ready to teach yourself while .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHeavy workloadUnclear lecturesSelf-study requiredStrict lab grading
  • and small writing details.
  • Lectures are often described as .
  • , and success depends heavily on self-study and tutoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and grades tied closely to sustained effort.

Online evidence is one harsh grading review, while and heavy self-study.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The chemistry content is challenging and becomes harder because lectures often do not clearly support weaker students.

Online feedback focuses on disorganization, while , and self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory or warn that skipping class hurts performance.

The online review gives no attendance evidence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend him because of , and a discouraging classroom experience.

Both formats are negative, with online criticizing organization and in-person criticizing lectures and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly call him a , and small details.

Format shift

Online mentions grammar-based point deductions, while .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students describe lots of , and the need to study independently.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is limited, while , and due dates.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students often say his lectures are unclear, weak, rambling, or .

Format shift

Online evidence points to disorganization, while and limited clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and tests, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

Online evidence mainly concerns grading, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe weak lectures, mandatory or , and .

Main concern

Students often , and meticulous lab work instead of lectures.

What students said

“ !!!!”
CHEMB1B
“Lectures are weak. .”
CHEMB1A
“ .”
CHEMB1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review describes an details.

Main concern

and poor organization made the online course frustrating.

What students said

“ .”
CHEMB1B
“Made it hard for many students during online school.”
CHEMB1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a lab practical, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book policies.

Chapter ExamsLab PracticalTough Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a lab practical, but do not clearly prove specific exam rules.

Chapter ExamsLab PracticalTough Tests
“Has an .”
CHEMB1A
“ ”
CHEMB1A
“You'll use all of them on the lab practical”
CHEMB1A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He doesn't explain anything. if you can”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“His lectures are not the but they dont help if chemistry .”

⚖️

12/100

“ !!!!”

👍 Recommendation Level

8/100

“ if you can”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are weak. .
  • .
  • He beats around the bush and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • !!!!
  • .
  • Those small fractions of up.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • be prepared to spend lots of and studying on your own.
  • Requires a lot of work not for the lazy.
  • Don't fall behind on your online hw.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across many years , and workload.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEMB1A6 reviews
CHEMB1B4 reviews
B1A1 review
GENCHEM1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values