AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Maria Gonzalez

BASEDU · NUTRIB10 · NUTR10 · B10 · NUTRI10 · NUTRB10 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you can teach yourself, track every requirement, and tolerate disorganization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedPoor communicationHard testsLots of homeworkUnclear lectures
  • , and weak communication.
  • as hard or poorly aligned with lectures and notes.
  • A few students earned high grades, but many still say the learning experience was poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students got A-range grades, but , and self-teaching.

Authoritative counts provide only in-person evidence, including one in-person-coded comment that describes taking the class on Zoom.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The subject itself is not always described as hard, but and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Participation matters and pop quizzes are mentioned, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students advise against taking her because of poor communication, disorganization, and weak teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and limited feedback.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Several reviews mention lots of work, and projects.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments say , and hard to reach.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and online Cengage or MindTap assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person-coded reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about , and poor communication.

Main concern

Students may need to self-teach while and .

What students said

“she doesnt really teach you the material, she just skips through PowerPoints and expect you todo everything”
NUTRB10
“ ”
NUTRB10
“the but the ”
NUTR10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students , and poor alignment between lectures and test material.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesInsufficient Test Information

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and insufficient information for exams.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesInsufficient Test Information
“doesnt provide enough information for the test.”
NUTRB10
“she likes to give out pop quizes.”
NUTRB10
“the but the that's on it.”
NUTR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Sweet person but incredibly horrible as a professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“She teaches from the textbook using the no additional information.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

28/100

“She makes lots of mistakes so always make sure she inputs the write grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures weren't really that good she just reads straight from the cengage slides.
  • .
  • and meek.

Theme 2

📈

  • and textbook hardly any help to you.
  • i failed her class because and the because she did not have any lectures about some of the questions on the test.
  • and passed one but i turned in and I passed the class with an A.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • She also was very hard to communicate with out of class.
  • She hardly ever responds to emails, even when she sends you one first.
  • She is late to class 90% of the , and ignores emails.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across many years show consistent negative patterns with several detailed examples.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

NUTRB1010 reviews
NUTR103 reviews
B101 review
BASEDU1 review
NUTRI101 review
Show 1 more courses
NUTRIB101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1