AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rebecca Ramos

MATHB1A · MATHB4A · B22 · MATHB22 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and tolerate heavy rules, workload, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor TeachingExcessive WorkStrict RulesTest HeavyLow Support
  • Every review is strongly negative and .
  • , and rules that hurt grades.
  • Both online and in-person reviews report weak support and stressful assessments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because , and tests that do not match instruction.

Online reviews stress Zoom rules and workload, while and mismatched tests.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course feels difficult mainly because students say the and assessments do not match what was taught.

Both formats report difficulty, with online students citing unhelpful videos and in-person students citing weak lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance and meeting rules appear strict because reviews repeatedly mention grade penalties, Zoom requirements, and skip-class warnings.

Online evidence mentions required Zoom meetings, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

No student recommends her, and reviews consistently describe poor teaching, heavy work, and grade-damaging rules.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students report , and assessments that feel disconnected from instruction.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on rule-based grade slips, while and poor preparation.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews , and problems that do not support learning.

Format shift

Both formats describe heavy workload, with online reviews especially noting poor balance.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students consistently say she does not teach clearly, relies on videos or slides, and gives little useful help.

Format shift

Online students cite unhelpful videos, while in-person students cite weak lectures and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests, midterms, cumulative finals, pop quizzes, and labs as .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests requiring Zoom, while and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe monotonous or , and poor feedback timing.

Main concern

Students say class time does not prepare them for .

What students said

“She gives you YouTube videos to watch instead of lecturing during class hours.”
B22
“labs and tests are so different from what you learned in class and homework”
MATHB4A
“Excessive work not conducive to learning or info retention”
MATHB1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe heavy Zoom dependence, complicated rules, unhelpful videos, and too much work.

Main concern

Students say the online format relies on Zoom and videos without enough useful teaching support.

What students said

“Relied heavy on zoom and has really complicated rules that can lead to grade slips”
MATHB22
“the professor does not go over them but instead leads back to her videos”
MATHB4A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear strict and stressful because students mention , and a cumulative final.

Zoom Test MeetingsTest HeavyPop QuizzesCumulative Final

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a cumulative final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesCumulative Final
“Test heavy”
MATHB1A
“gave our midterms back 2 days before the ”
B22
“labs and tests are so different from what you learned in class and homework”
MATHB4A

Online

Online reviews explicitly say tests require Zoom meetings, but they do not clearly .

Zoom Test MeetingsTest Heavy
“Even the .”
MATHB22
“Lots of homework”
MATHB4A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessment risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“She is too lazy to teach so she will put you in study groups”

⚠️ Workload Pressure

10/100

“Excessive work not conducive to learning or info retention”

🧪

18/100

“labs and tests are so different from what you learned in class and homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She gives you YouTube videos to watch instead of lecturing during class hours.
  • She just reads off from powerpoints

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She has overly tedious rules that can cause .
  • Relied heavy on zoom and has really complicated rules that can lead to grade slips
  • which forces you to fail no matter how much you study.

Theme 3

🧾

  • Excessive work not conducive to learning or info retention
  • This professor does not understand how to balance the amount of work to give to the students
  • Even the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed, recent, and completely consistent in negative tone.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATHB4A2 reviews
B221 review
MATHB1A1 review
MATHB221 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values