AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Charles Truvillion

FIRE25B · FIRE25C · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid Charles Truvillion online unless you can work independently with little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to contactPoor online supportSlow gradingUnhelpful feedbackPlatform confusion
  • Both online reviewers report weak communication and slow responses.
  • Students say he struggled with the online platform and could not answer basic questions.
  • The recommendation signal is extremely negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

There is no grade evidence, and high grade harder than the workload alone suggests.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material does not sound extremely hard, but students struggled because the instructor could not guide them well online.

All course difficulty evidence comes from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state whether attendance or participation was required.

, and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students would not retake him because , and subject support were poor.

The negative recommendation evidence comes entirely from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Grading is hard to trust because students mention few graded items and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload appears reading- and assignment-driven, and poor support makes the effort feel heavier.

Format shift

All workload evidence is online only.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students consistently describe him as hard to reach, unhelpful, slow, and not knowledgeable enough.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is online only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and few graded items, with .

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe poor communication, , and limited help.

Main concern

Students may not get timely or .

What students said

“Very hard to get in contact with him.”
FIRE25C
“This guy was so lost the whole class.”
FIRE25B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy was so lost the whole class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in communication, teaching, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“This guy was so lost the whole class.”

📬 Communication

8/100

“Very hard to get in contact with him.”

🧾

28/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This guy was so lost the whole class.
  • Wasn't very knowledgeable about the subject.

Theme 2

📬 About Communication

  • Very hard to get in contact with him.
  • He was slow to respond to questions, and .

Theme 3

🧩 About Online Support

  • He didn't understand the online platform and couldn't answer basic questions.
  • He couldn't help with simple questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent enough for the period and highly consistent in their complaints.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

FIRE25B1 review
FIRE25C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values