AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Vincent Van Horne

CRN72122 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you want a their goals.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringMotivationalGoal-OrientedRespected
  • Students describe him as caring and motivational.
  • The only reviewed student earned an A+ but .
  • Evidence is very positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

The A+ grade is positive, but the comment focuses on support rather than proving an effortless A.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The review suggests guided, practical learning but gives little detail about content difficulty.

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

The only evidence is in person and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

The student strongly recommends him because , and helpful.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

The A+ grade is strong, but the review .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The review does not mention workload, so workload lightness is uncertain.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

The student describes him as caring, motivational, and effective at helping students reach goals.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly describe assignments, quizzes, exams, or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and emphasizes care, motivation, and practical guidance.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one review.

What students said

“ and very motivational , he helped me meet my goals and taught me the correct way to get there.”
CRN72122

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was a great teacher I would love to have him again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ and very motivational , he helped me meet my goals and taught me the correct way to get there.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“He was a great teacher I would love to have him again.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was a great teacher I would love to have him again.
  • and very motivational , he helped me meet my goals and taught me the correct way to get there.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, even though it is detailed and strongly positive.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CRN721221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values