AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Nancy Mai

MEDSB35 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless , and attendance-based requirements.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture HeavyLots of ReadingWeekly HomeworkTough GraderAttendance Graded
  • Students describe Nancy Mai as personally nice but frustrating in course design.
  • The class requires , and lecture-heavy study.
  • Getting a high grade is possible but costly because and is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

The A- shows a strong grade is possible, but students must handle heavy , and little .

All evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online review evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content feels hard because it is lecture heavy and requires a ton of reading.

Only the in-person review provides evidence about course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

, so students should treat attendance as required.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The student would not take the class again because the structure, workload, grading, and .

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

18/100

The review directly calls her a and says there is barely any .

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Heavy

18/100

The class has a ton of .

Format shift

Only the in-person review discusses workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

The student says she is nice personally, but the lecture-heavy class design does not help them learn well.

Format shift

Only the in-person review discusses teaching experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment , and .

Format shift

Only the in-person review mentions assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review reports a demanding, lecture-heavy class with weekly online work and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ ”
MEDSB35
“ ”
MEDSB35

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review mentions weekly online quizzes and exams but does not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Weekly Online QuizzesExams MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and exams but does not clearly prove the .

Weekly Online QuizzesExams MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
MEDSB35
“ ”
MEDSB35

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes a , but the way she does the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ ”

📚 Workload

18/100

“you have to read a TON”

⚖️

18/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes a , but the way she does the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you have to read a TON

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only one older review is available, but it gives , and attendance.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MEDSB351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values