AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Lora Larkin

PSYCHB5 · PSYCB33 · PSYCPSYC · PSYC1A · PSYCB2 · PYSCB5 · PSYCHB1 · PSYCB1A · PSYC5 · PSYCHB33 · PSYCH33 · PSYCHB1A · PSCHB1A · PSYCH1A · PSYC1 · PSYCB6 · PSYCH5STATS · PSYCHB6 · B2 · PSYCHHHH · PSYCHOL · PSYCB5 · 68 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive professor and are willing to attend, read, and keep up with steady work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient explainerHighly recommendedExtra credit availableClear expectationsAttendance matters
  • Students consistently describe Larkin as patient, caring, and willing to slow down until the class understands.
  • Grades are usually fair and helped by , and .
  • The main tradeoff is that , and steady weekly work matter, especially in stats and online sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Getting an A is realistic with , and steady effort, but most comments do not describe it as automatic.

Online evidence points to easy weekly work, while attendance, notes, and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Psychology content is generally approachable, but statistics is repeatedly described as tough even with strong teaching support.

Online courses sound easier and more self-paced, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say showing up is important and skipping class causes problems.

Online reviews emphasize weekly completion instead of attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend her because , and fair when students do the work.

Both online and stronger enthusiasm about her teaching style.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Grading is usually fair to lenient because , and notes on some exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and easy assignments, while , and participation-based support.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is steady rather than light, with , and attendance expectations.

Format shift

Online sections have regular reading and weekly tasks, while work, and exam prep.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and willing to explain until students understand.

Format shift

Online reviews praise responsiveness and , while and personal support.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Grades appear to come from a mix of quizzes, exams, assignments, papers, projects, participation, and .

Format shift

Online sections lean toward quizzes and written/project work, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews emphasize patient lectures, strong support, fair grading, , and .

Main concern

Skipping class can hurt because lectures, notes, and participation are tied to success.

What students said

“ and doesn't move on into another chapter until the class comprehends it, even if it put us off schedule.”
PSYCB5
“Show up and you should pass.”
PSYCB5
“Statistics is a hard class but is bearable with Larkin.”
PSYCHB5

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a clear, manageable class built around textbook , and .

Main concern

Online students need to keep up with reading and weekly platform work.

What students said

“Gen Psych Online. Only need the Revel access code don't need the text book.”
PSCHB1A
“I took the class online. It was relatively easy.”
PSCHB1A
“Easy online class. and .”
PSYCB1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but online exam rules are not clearly proven beyond quizzes, assignments, and projects.

Cheat Sheet AllowedOpen Notes MentionedDropped Lowest ExamWeekly QuizzesFinal Project

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention notes or cheat sheets on exams, dropped scores, and some straightforward but .

Cheat Sheet AllowedOpen Notes MentionedDropped Lowest ExamStraightforward Tests
“She allows a .”
PSYCB5
“She allows notes on mid term and final!”
PSYCB33
“ , but lets you use a cheat sheet and !”
PSYCHB5

Online

Online , and final projects, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Weekly QuizzesFinal ProjectTextbook-Based Quizzes
“13 Quizzes you need the textbook to be able to answer the questions :/”
PSYCB33
“For .”
PSYCHB33
“10-15 question quiz on a chapter every week.”
PSYCB33

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is hands down of the and down to Earth, it's a blessing and luck to have her as your professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She goes over the hw which helps the students see the mistakes they made.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“10000% recommend this class”

⚖️

76/100

“She is an but she does make sure you know the material.”

📚 Workload Reality

58/100

“As long as you read the material and complete the weekly assignments, you should pass without over extending yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ability, so her students can understand.
  • and doesn't move on into another chapter until the class comprehends it, even if it put us off schedule.
  • She makes math easy to comprehend.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you show up and pay attention.
  • The class wasn't an easy A but if and study, odds are you will pass.
  • You get the grade you earn!

Theme 3

📝

  • She allows a .
  • Exams 40%, assignments 30%, survey project 30%.
  • For .

Theme 4

❤️ About Support & Personality

  • She's willing to work with every students in every step of the way.
  • and is always there to answer questions.
  • and questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

68

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show consistent themes despite a few negative outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 517
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCB511 reviews
PSYC54 reviews
PSYCB24 reviews
PSYCHB54 reviews
PSCHB1A3 reviews
Show 17 more courses
PSYC1A3 reviews
PSYCB333 reviews
B22 reviews
PSYCB1A2 reviews
PSYCHB1A2 reviews
PSYC11 review
PSYCB61 review
PSYCH1A1 review
PSYCH331 review
PSYCH5STATS1 review
PSYCHB11 review
PSYCHB331 review
PSYCHB61 review
PSYCHHHH1 review
PSYCHOL1 review
PSYCPSYC1 review
PYSCB51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values