AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Catherine Njoroge

MATHB22 · STATSB1 · B22 · MATHB65 · MATH31919 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you are ready to teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear LecturesUnhelpfulTough GraderHeavy HomeworkTest Heavy
  • Students consistently describe and .
  • Many reviews say questions are dismissed or redirected to tutoring and YouTube.
  • The and very low recommendation support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and little useful help.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The math content may be standard, but and poor support make it feel much harder than it should.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple tags say skipping class means you will not pass, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students because the and help is unavailable.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Reviews repeatedly tag her as a and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Students often mention lots of , and pop quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students consistently describe her lectures as , and unhelpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention test-heavy classes, study guides, exams, and pop quizzes.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with , and heavy testing.

Main concern

Students say they must rely on YouTube or tutoring because direct help is ineffective.

What students said

“YouTube and while taking her.”
MATHB65
“You'll be teaching yourself a lot in this class.”
MATHB22
“YouTube is your only hope because I guarantee that will instead be your professor.”
MATHB22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesStudy Guides Before Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam study guides, but do not clearly prove the exact exam policy.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesStudy Guides Before Exams
“She gives a study guide before each exam that .”
MATHB65
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATHB22
“Test heavy”
MATHB65

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'll be teaching yourself a lot in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“She doesnt understand her own material or the textbook she told us to get.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

0/100

“JUST THE WORST. !!!!”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“ if you don't keep up with it as you cover each chapter in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Very monotone which makes lecture boring.
  • basically just talks to herself instead of teaching.

Theme 2

🆘 About Help And Support

  • .
  • if you ask for help she will tell you to go to the tutoring center instead of helping you.
  • Ask her for help? hahaha You're funny

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed in-person reviews across several terms are highly consistent despite being older.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATHB224 reviews
MATHB652 reviews
B221 review
MATH319191 review
STATSB11 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2