AI Rate Professor

Information Technology

Zebedee Smith

CNSTB9 · ACDC · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you mainly want an easy grade and can tolerate weak structure.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery Easy GradingDisorganized CourseLow StructureLaid Back Personality
  • The course appears very easy to pass, but the teaching quality is inconsistent and .
  • One review reports no , and a .
  • A second older review is positive about his personality and industry experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Getting an A looks very easy because one review says he barely graded and reused the midterm as the final.

All Easy A .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content seems low difficulty, but poor organization .

, and they point to low difficulty with inconsistent delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, though one review says he skipped many class days.

, and online evidence is unavailable.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Recommendation is weak because the most detailed review describes a poorly run class despite the easy grade.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

because one student says he did not grade anything.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

86/100

The workload seems light because the course had little graded structure and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload, and there is no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is dragged down by reports of no syllabus, skipped days, and off-topic instruction.

Format shift

review and one broad positive review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment evidence is a as the final.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

but inconsistent class with mixed teaching value.

Main concern

Course organization and teaching focus are the main concerns.

What students said

“He doesn't grade anything, didn't get a syllabus at all”
CNSTB9
“ knowledgable!”
ACDC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm reused as the final, but .

In-Class MidtermFinal Reused From Midterm

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention a as the book policy.

In-Class MidtermFinal Reused From Midterm
“he wrote the and we took it as ”
CNSTB9

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't grade anything, didn't get a syllabus at all”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He tried to teach Residential electrical wiring, but ended up teaching us more about this diet.”

📈 Easy Grade

92/100

“He doesn't grade anything, didn't get a syllabus at all”

👍 Recommendation Split

28/100

“ knowledgable!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He tried to teach Residential electrical wiring, but ended up teaching us more about this diet.
  • Proffesor Smith is a cool laid back person with a cool beard!!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Structure

  • He doesn't grade anything, didn't get a syllabus at all
  • he wrote the and we took it as

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and their tone is highly inconsistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACDC1 review
CNSTB91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values