AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Arthur Kendall

PHILB6A · PHILB7 · PHILLB6A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are highly interested in philosophy and , and inconsistent feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GradingDisorganized LecturesHeavy EssaysPop QuizzesRude Comments
  • Most reviews describe confusing or unfocused lectures that .
  • Students report , and .
  • The only strong positive review says the professor can help extensively with papers if students like philosophy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and , even though one student said the class was not much work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content is made harder by lectures that students say drift off topic or .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because one review says the class was manageable if you just show up, while another mentions missed classes by the professor.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students would avoid the class because of , and poor organization.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly say papers are graded hard and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of , and many essays, though one older review says it was not much work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Teaching is described as , and sidetracked, with one older review calling her very good.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and pop quizzes rather than clearly described exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, heavy writing, harsh grading, and weak organization.

Main concern

Students may struggle because grading and .

What students said

“Her lectures dont correlate with the homework so .”
PHILB7
“She grades a bit slow and often .”
PHILB6A
“ ”
PHILLB6A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes but do not clearly prove a .

Pop QuizzesUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the full exam format or proctoring policy.

Pop QuizzesUnclear Exam Policy
“So and pop quizzes!”
PHILB7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her lectures dont correlate with the homework so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“She is very unorganized, missed alot of classes, has very crude jokes, and is super biased in politics.”

⚖️

20/100

“She grades a bit slow and often .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“assigns LOTS of essays, and has successfully scared more than half the class away.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures dont correlate with the homework so .
  • sidetracks her lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Workload

  • She
  • assigns LOTS of essays
  • So and pop quizzes!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Probably the .
  • She is a very good teacher though and will help you extensively with your papers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across several years show a consistent negative pattern, but several are old and some lack grade outcomes.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILB6A3 reviews
PHILB71 review
PHILLB6A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1