AI Rate Professor

Economics

Stephen Smith

MICRO · ECON1 · ECONB1 · ECON · MACROECON · ECONMICRO · ECONB2 · MICROECON · B1 · B1B2 · B2 · ECONOB2 · ECON2 · MICROECONOMICS · ECONB1B2 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a low-stress economics class and can tolerate lecture-heavy, sometimes boring delivery.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery Easy AStudy Guide DrivenTest Questions GivenBoring But HelpfulLenient Grading
  • Most students describe the class as very easy if , and use the study guide.
  • , but many reviews say questions or study materials are provided before tests.
  • Teaching quality is mixed, with many students finding him helpful and clear while some call lectures boring or confusing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Getting an A is usually low effort because students repeatedly say exams come from study guides, notes, or questions given in advance.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course content is presented as non-major friendly and basic, though some students say lectures can drag or .

, and they mostly describe an easy economics course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

as mandatory, but students say being there and taking notes matters for exams.

In-person , while there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and helpful preparation, but negative reviews warn about boring or .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

because exams are predictable, the lowest exam may be dropped, and or makeup chances are mentioned.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

Work usually consists of a , and studying provided materials.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload, and most call it light.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and caring, but a noticeable minority describe lectures as boring, scattered, or poor.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Grades appear driven mainly , and notes.

Format shift

as the central assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews mostly describe an easy, structured class with and manageable work.

Main concern

Some students found lectures boring, unclear, or too dependent on memorizing study guides.

What students said

“Really really easy class, possibly the easiest class I have taken.”
ECONB1
“Professor Smith's class is overall fairly easy.”
ECONB2
“I hated his class. he's not a good teacher.”
ECONB2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but exams are student-friendly because questions and study materials are often provided in advance.

Questions Given Before TestsStudy Guide Based ExamsLowest Exam DroppedMultiple Choice And Short Answer

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe exams based on study guides, notes, and questions given before test day, with .

Questions Given Before TestsStudy Guide Based ExamsLowest Exam DroppedMultiple Choice And Short Answer
“Gives you the questions prior to the test.”
ECONB1
“There are 3 exams (he drops the lowest 1), final exam, few h/w assingments, and 3 Article summary assingments.”
ECONB2
“ but he gives you all the questions before the tests so you can study.”
MACROECON

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really really easy class, possibly the easiest class I have taken.To get an A, read the Study guide, half the , and he tells you what the other half is going to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Very good teacher. and interesting.”

📈 Easy A Potential

92/100

“Even if econ is not your best interest, you could still pull an A. Easily.”

📝

86/100

“He even gives you the short answer questions before the test.”

⚠️ Lecture Risk

45/100

“his lectures are not very clear, he jumps all over the place when he's writing notes on the board and confuses you more than you already are.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very good teacher with a sense of humor. Made a somewhat boring subject interesting
  • He really tries to make this as easy on the students as possible.
  • The class is boring. He is dull, though he tries not to be.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • All you and then right before the test he tells you the questions for the test.
  • easy class. put in a little and i mean a little effort and youll get an a.
  • Great professor, study for tests and guaranteed A

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Work

  • ALL THE ANSWERS ARE IN THE STUDY GUIDE BOOK.
  • just 3 tests, drops the lowest one, 3 article summaries, and 6 easy HW's.
  • Everything on the and all mulitple choice questions are in the study guides.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 44 reviews span many years and show consistent themes, though many comments are old and some are vague.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ECONB111 reviews
ECONB29 reviews
ECON15 reviews
ECON23 reviews
ECONB1B23 reviews
Show 10 more courses
B12 reviews
ECON2 reviews
MICRO2 reviews
B1B21 review
B21 review
ECONMICRO1 review
ECONOB21 review
MACROECON1 review
MICROECON1 review
MICROECONOMICS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1