AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Kathy Aiello-Wise

CHDV · CHDV49 · CHDV46 · CHDV3122 · CHDVB40 · CHDVB49 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless and weak communication almost entirely on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationDisorganizedConfusing InstructionsHarsh Student ExperienceOnline Course Problems
  • Students repeatedly report poor communication, long response times, and lost or mishandled assignments.
  • The strongest complaints focus on confusing instructions, disorganization, and rude treatment.
  • A few positive older comments exist, but they are overwhelmed by severe negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

A high grade looks risky because students report lost work, unclear requirements, dropped students, and .

Online and and submission risk.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The subject itself may not be the main issue, but and poor course organization make the class hard to navigate.

, while in-person-coded reviews add dropped students and assignment handling problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews describe strict procedural requirements, required CPR certification, proofreading rules, and threats of being dropped.

Online reviews mention mandatory CPR certification, while and submission rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking her because of poor communication, disorganization, and disrespectful treatment.

Both online and , though online reviews are especially severe.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report failing , and grade-entry problems.

Format shift

Online reviews cite failing outcomes and poor response, while and grade errors.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is worsened by CPR certification, proofreading requirements, mailed references, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention required CPR, while , and strict instructions.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most comments describe poor communication, confusing instructions, disorganization, and rude interactions.

Format shift

Online and in-person-coded reviews both report weak support and serious course management problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews focus more on assignments, papers, proofreading, CPR requirements, and submission problems than on exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

comments about online-style administration, dropped students, lost work, and disorganization.

Main concern

Students report , and .

What students said

“Extremely conflicting instructions, NO communication, and a high and mighty attitude.”
CHDVB49
“The .”
CHDVB49
“ if you don't follow her instructions to the tee.”
CHDV46

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, , and a lack of support.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“she did not responded to my emails or anything.”
CHDV49
“She is terrible at responding to both emails and phone calls.”
CHDVB49
“Run!!”
CHDVB49

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quiz and test mistakes, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

Quiz MistakesTest ErrorsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test errors but do not clearly prove the .

Quiz MistakesTest Errors
“She makes ”
CHDV46
“She submits the wrong tests”
CHDVB49

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely conflicting instructions, NO communication, and a high and mighty attitude.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 , and student recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Very uninspired teaching, uninterested in helping students excel or realize full potential.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

10/100

“She is terrible at responding to both emails and phone calls.”

📄 Course Organization

25/100

“The .”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • she did not responded to my emails or anything.
  • NO communication
  • She doesn't get back to you for over a week.

Theme 2

📄 About Organization & Rules

  • and mailed in with copies of references.
  • if you don't follow her instructions to the tee.
  • and incorrectly enters grades into the school system.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • Run!!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across many years provide detailed, consistent complaints despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHDVB4910 reviews
CHDV495 reviews
CHDV1 review
CHDV31221 review
CHDV461 review
Show 1 more courses
CHDVB401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1