AI Rate Professor

Academic Skills Development

Carol Schaefer

ACDVB50 · ACDVREADING · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you will participate and do the work, because most students say she helps you earn a good grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportiveGood FeedbackParticipation MattersAccepts Late WorkMixed Personality Reviews
  • Most reviews describe her as supportive, professional, and invested in students passing.
  • Grades look very achievable if students participate and .
  • One review is sharply negative about her attitude, so the personality fit may not be universal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students say a good grade or A is very reachable if , and use her help.

All Easy A evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course seems manageable because success depends more on participation and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Participation matters, but reviews do .

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and helps them pass.

and mostly positive with one strong negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Late work is accepted, and students say completing the work can lead to an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Students mention , and participation, but not an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Three reviews describe her as supportive, knowledgeable, and engaging, while one calls her rude.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The comments , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing feedback, acceptance of late work, and fair rewards for completing assignments.

Main concern

One student found her rude and unsympathetic.

What students said

“As long as you do the work you will pass with an A.”
ACDVB50
“she really gets to know all of her students”
ACDVB50
“Horrible teacher. Has no sympathy.”
ACDV READING

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you participate and her course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“would love to have her as !”

⚖️

80/100

“As long as you do the work you will pass with an A.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is very professional and knowledgeable and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • she really gets to know all of her students
  • Professor Schaefer accepts late work and is there to help you pass.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you participate and her course.
  • As long as you do the work you will pass with an A.
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Horrible teacher. Has no sympathy.
  • Rude beyond belief.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but the sample is small and includes one strong outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACDVB503 reviews
ACDV READING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values