AI Rate Professor

English

Susan McQuerry

ENSLB50 · ENSL1 · ENSLB1 · B51 · ENSLB02 · ENGESL · ESL · EMLSB50 · ESL204 · ESL12 · ENSL50 · ENGLISH1 · ENSLB31 · B50 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want structure and real feedback, but avoid her if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganizedHomework HeavyStrict AttendanceHelpful Writing CoachPicky Grader
  • Students consistently describe Susan McQuerry as , and good for learning writing.
  • The class content is usually manageable, but , and participation matter a lot.
  • Getting an A is realistic, but only for students who submit work on time and tolerate strict classroom rules.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is very possible because the work is not hard, but students , and participation on time.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students often call the class easy and helpful, but the amount of , and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge, and they mostly frame the material as manageable but work-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and punctuality are treated strictly, and multiple students say missed or late work hurts them.

All attendance evidence is from in-person reviews, where students repeatedly warn not to miss or arrive late.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her for organization and help, while a minority , and attitude.

Recommendation evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with generally positive but not universal support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students say she grades many small items and can be picky on essays, though passing is realistic with consistent work.

Format shift

, and they show strict but predictable standards.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and several essays appear frequently across reviews.

Format shift

All workload evidence is in person, with repeated comments about a lot of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students , and ability to support writing, despite some complaints about strictness.

Format shift

Teaching and is mostly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and in-class writing rather than exams.

Format shift

, while there is no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

class is easy to pass when students keep up with homework and attendance.

Main concern

, and essays can frustrate less organized students.

What students said

“This teacher is good easy class but a lot of homeworks , we had to do 6 essays but all of them were easy just don't miss class and and you will pass easily”
ENSL50
“She's a great teacher but gives out a lot of time for class cus if you don't she won't accept the homework”
ENSL1
“The class requires a lot of work, and a lot of responsability.”
ESL204

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention in-class essays, but they do not clearly prove the .

In-Class EssaysExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention in-class essays, but they .

In-Class EssaysExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Lots of in class essays.”
B51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“GUYS EASY CLASS BUT ALOT OF WORK. THE WORK SHE GIVES TO DO IS NOT HARD BUT .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 in-person reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Mrs. McQuerry was the . I feel lucky to have had her.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“The class requires a lot of work, and a lot of responsability.”

⚖️ Grade Cost

70/100

“if and participate in class you will get an A easily”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is by far, the and neat professor I've ever had.
  • .HELPFUL, I REALLY WAS LUCKY TO BE HER STUDENT.
  • , but she gives out a lot of homework.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class easy A but she does run the class like if we were 2nd graders.
  • GUYS EASY CLASS BUT ALOT OF WORK.
  • you need to study hard and do Hw ,then you should be pass.Good teacher.

Theme 3

⏰

  • you can't miss class, and you can't come late to class
  • if !
  • Very strict, but for our own good. Love her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 20 reviews with consistent themes, but many are old and some are brief.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENSL504 reviews
B512 reviews
ENSLB312 reviews
ENSLB502 reviews
B501 review
Show 9 more courses
EMLSB501 review
ENGESL1 review
ENGLISH11 review
ENSL11 review
ENSLB021 review
ENSLB11 review
ESL1 review
ESL121 review
ESL2041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1