AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Catherina Mojibi

ENGR47 · ENGRB47 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Take Catherina Mojibi if you want a strong introductory engineering professor and can keep up with labs and projects.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnowledgeablePassionateEngineering ExperienceBeginner FriendlyLab Attendance Important
  • Students describe her as excellent, knowledgeable, and passionate about engineering.
  • The course appears manageable for an introductory engineering class, especially with Excel preparation.
  • because labs, projects, and the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A looks attainable, but students , and be ready for Excel.

All evidence comes from three in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course is framed as an intro class, but , and Excel require preparation.

Only in-person reviews exist and they describe a manageable introductory engineering course.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because labs and class work and projects.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend her because she knows engineering well, teaches with passion, and supports beginners.

Only in-person reviews exist and all are positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

The limited grade evidence is positive, but reviews .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The course includes labs, Excel assignments, and three projects, but students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students praise her expertise, engineering background, passion, and helpful beginner guidance.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize Excel lab assignments, three projects, and an .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive and , and .

Main concern

Students should attend labs and prepare for Excel-based work.

What students said

“Excellent professor!”
ENGRB47
“Some assignments are in the ”
ENGRB47
“For an intro .”
ENGR47

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The work in the computer lab, with no clear proof of proctoring or open-book policy.

Excel FinalComputer Lab Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Excel FinalComputer Lab Assignments
“Some assignments are in the ”
ENGRB47

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent professor! She definitely knows what she is talking about and is very passionate about the engineering field.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, labs, and recommendation; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She definitely knows what she is talking about and is very passionate about the engineering field.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“Great ”

🧪 Course Structure

60/100

“There are so it is important to attend all classes, especially labs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent professor!
  • She knows her stuff from physics to material properties.
  • She's a nice teacher though.

Theme 2

🧪

  • Some assignments are in the
  • There are
  • it is important to .

Theme 3

📈 About Recommendation

  • Great
  • For an intro .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, so the positive pattern is useful but limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGRB472 reviews
ENGR471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values