AI Rate Professor

History

Kathleen Freeland

HISTB17 · HIST17 · HIS232 · HISA · HISTB17A · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
65/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you want a serious history course and can keep up with , and detailed exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy ReadingClear and HelpfulDetailed TestsFair but DemandingUseful Study Guides
  • and writing demands.
  • , and well organized, but .
  • Getting a good grade requires steady work rather than last-minute studying.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A good grade is possible, but students repeatedly say it takes lots of , and sustained effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is manageable with study guides and clear teaching, but the and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

because lectures are informative and missing class can mean missing homework details.

, and none prove a strict mandatory policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

and helpful resources, but several warn that the workload and grading are demanding.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students describe grading as fair but demanding, with detailed work needed for decent grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is heavy because reviews repeatedly mention lots of reading, writing, essays, and time commitment.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe her as , and organized, despite a few negative experiences.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and a final rather than relying on one format.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a knowledgeable and studying, and consistent effort.

Main concern

The main concern is the and .

What students said

“Tons of reading.”
HIS232
“Gotta work hard to earn a good grade.”
HISTB17A
“Not a hard class, just time consuming.”
HISTB17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention detailed tests, a midterm, a final, and study guides, but .

Detailed TestsStudy GuidesMidtermFinal

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but exam rules like open-book or closed-book are not clearly proven.

Detailed TestsStudy GuidesMidtermFinal
“ and long.”
HISTB17A
“Gives study guides for midterm and final.”
HISTB17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is an awesome teacher but you have to work for it!”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and helpful.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“Tons of reading.”

⚖️

30/100

“Gotta work hard to earn a good grade.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful.
  • !
  • She gives long lectures, but they are very informative

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Tons of reading.
  • Lots and lots of reading but this is college people!
  • Lots of reading and writting.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • and long.
  • Gotta work hard to earn a good grade.
  • very hard on grades.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide consistent themes, but they are older and grade data is limited.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HISTB17A3 reviews
HIS2322 reviews
HISA1 review
HIST171 review
HISTB171 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1