AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Megan Gretona

CHDVB20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can manage frequent work and are comfortable with mixed lecture quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed Teaching QualityCaring When AskedLots of WorkEasy WorkWeak Lectures
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with two recommendations and one strong warning.
  • Students say there is a lot of work, though one review says the work is easy.
  • Teaching quality is inconsistent, with praise for caring support but criticism of poor lectures and study guides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Reported grades are high and one student calls the work easy, but the workload prevents this from being a low-effort A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The assignments are described as easy by one student, but poor lecture support and unhelpful study guides add friction.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation is mixed because two students recommend her, while one .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

The listed grades are strong and the work may be easy, but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students mention a lot of work, essays, and as easy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is split between caring and and exam preparation.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize essays and , though one review mentions an exam and study guides.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, praising her care and easy work while , and .

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent teaching quality and a lot of assignments.

What students said

“There is a lot of work but it is easy so stay on top of it.”
CHDVB20
“Terrible teacher.”
CHDVB20
“ ”
CHDVB20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention an exam and unhelpful study guides, but do not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, or proctoring policies.

ExamStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but do not clearly prove the .

ExamStudy Guides
“her study guides do not help at all for the exam.”
CHDVB20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a lot of work but it is easy so stay on top of it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Mrs. Gretona is a great teacher, she cares about her students and is willing to help you if you ask for help.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“There is a lot of essays and homework”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“I would never suggest taking her to anyone.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mrs. Gretona is a great teacher, she cares about her students and is willing to help you if you ask for help.
  • Terrible teacher.
  • She

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of work but it is easy so stay on top of it.
  • There is a lot of essays and homework

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • !
  • I would never suggest taking her to anyone.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict sharply despite giving useful details about workload and teaching.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDVB203 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values