AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Patrick Coyle

CULARTS · FDSV55A · INT404 · FDSV55 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Patrick Coyle if you want a caring but demanding instructor who expects professional-level effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful InstructorStrict StandardsReal ExperienceCaring Teacher
  • Students describe him as helpful, experienced, and caring.
  • The class can be tough, especially for advanced or practical culinary work.
  • Strictness appears tied to professional standards rather than unfairness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Grades seem earned through staying on top of the work, not through an easy-A setup.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Students say the class is tough but manageable, especially when professional kitchen standards apply.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and it does not mention attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because , and cares about students despite being strict.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

The comments suggest strict professional expectations rather than harsh or .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss strictness.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

The workload seems manageable if students stay on top of everything, but the class is not light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

87/100

Students consistently describe him as helpful, experienced, caring, and worth recommending.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

, but assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe him as , and strict when standards matter.

Main concern

His strictness and tough expectations may feel intense to less prepared students.

What students said

“ and responded to my questions in decent time.”
INT 404
“one can learn a lot from him and his experience”
CULARTS
“he is also strict”
FDSV55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or requirements.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, standards, and student support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

87/100

“ and responded to my questions in decent time.”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“ ”

⚖️ Standards

48/100

“he is also strict”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and responded to my questions in decent time.
  • one can learn a lot from him and his experience

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Standards

  • The class is a little tough, but not impossible.
  • he is also strict

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he really does care for each one of his students!
  • I can tell he understands the working adult that is also back in school.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are five reviews over a long span, but several are old or vague.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CULARTS2 reviews
FDSV551 review
FDSV55A1 review
INT 4041 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values