AI Rate Professor

History

Anne Wiederrecht

HISTORYB1 · HISTB17A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and are willing to read, but expect uneven experiences by course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful FeedbackRequires ReadingMixed DifficultyLight HomeworkGroup Tests
  • Students mostly describe her as helpful and knowledgeable, but one review strongly warns against taking her.
  • Grades require doing the readings and .
  • Workload sounds light in one course but harder in another, so the experience depends on the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible with consistent reading and effort, but comments do not support an easy-A label.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

One student calls the class easy, while another says the readings and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

The recommendation is cautiously positive because two reviews praise her help and course experience while one strongly advises against her.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Students say you have to work for the grade, and there is .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

as not excessive, but readings and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

67/100

She is praised for feedback and explanations, but the small review set includes one strong negative outlier.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention reading, assignments, and and tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with two positive comments about help and manageable work and one very negative warning.

Main concern

and reliable group partners to do well.

What students said

“She is always and to explain something you don't understand.”
HISTORYB1
“ and there but nothing too crazy.”
HISTB17A
“ !!!!!”
HISTB17A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention group tests but do not .

Group TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but exam rules are not clearly described.

Group TestsPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Also make sure you pick reliable people to complete the 2 groups tests.”
HISTORYB1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“MS. Wiederrecht is a great teacher. She is always and to explain something you don't understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and mixed recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“She is always and to explain something you don't understand.”

📚 Effort Required

58/100

“You have to work for your grade and read everything she tells you.”

👍 Recommendation Signal

62/100

“Easy class. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • MS. Wiederrecht is a great teacher.
  • She is always and to explain something you don't understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to work for your grade and read everything she tells you.
  • Easy class. .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Mixed Experience

  • !!!!!
  • Also make sure you pick reliable people to complete the 2 groups tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the opinions are mixed.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HISTB17A2 reviews
HISTORYB11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values