AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Marcus Verhaegh

PHILB7 · B7 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing ExplanationsUnclear GradingQuiz HeavyLow Learning Value
  • and .
  • and sometimes arbitrary.
  • The class may be easy only for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A looks unreliable because quizzes and though one student found the class easy with reading and studying.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content could be manageable, but .

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person PHILB7 or B7 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

because students mention many classmates only showing up at the start and final.

, and none prove a mandatory policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because , and unsure how grades were decided.

The recommendation and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report and one says they failed despite doing well on papers and quizzes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload seems centered on reading, quizzes, papers, and a .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most comments , and did not help students learn.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear heavily based on quizzes and a short final, with one review saying quizzes were 50% of the grade.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and a low-learning experience despite low reported difficulty.

Main concern

Students say explanations and .

What students said

“Still he never answered a single question about what he would grade as correct and what would be incorrect”
PHILB7
“Long, rambling diatribes”
PHILB7
“Didnt learn a thing.”
B7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but do not clearly prove open-book status or proctoring rules.

Short FinalQuiz HeavyUnclear Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove the .

Short FinalQuiz Heavy
“the final, which was only 5 questions”
PHILB7
“50% of our grade was based on 5 question quizzes”
B7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Didnt learn a thing. Not a great professor”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Long, rambling diatribes”

⚖️

18/100

“Still he never answered a single question about what he would grade as correct and what would be incorrect”

📚 Course Effort

32/100

“All you need to do for this class is read the book and study for the quizzes!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Long, rambling diatribes
  • Didnt learn a thing.
  • As the semester went on he got a little better.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Tests

  • the final, which was only 5 questions
  • 50% of our grade was based on 5 question quizzes
  • Got an A on the paper and and he still failed me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four older in-person reviews are limited but and grading.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILB73 reviews
B71 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values