AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael Gutierrez

PHILB7 · PHILOSOPHYB7 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can tolerate uneven organization and rely on your own structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsSubject ExpertiseDisorganizedNeeds Experience
  • One student praised his expertise and confidence.
  • One student strongly criticized his organization and professionalism.
  • Evidence is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

There is too little grade evidence, and the and .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The comments do not show unusually easy or unusually hard content, but organization may make the class harder to manage.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is split between strong admiration and a .

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One review specifically criticizes disorganized grading, with .

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching is inconsistent, with one review praising expertise and one describing poor organization and professionalism.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

expertise and one calling the class disorganized.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent organization and professionalism.

What students said

“I found this professor to display a confidence and precision that betrayed expertise in his subject matter and a mastery of human nature.”
PHILOSOPHYB7
“Professor was a total mess, first time teaching I can understand the pressure, but not professional by any means.”
PHILB7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor was a total mess, first time teaching I can understand the pressure, but not professional by any means.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and organization. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“I found this professor to display a confidence and precision that betrayed expertise in his subject matter and a mastery of human nature.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“He is very disorganized in ”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“ as a professional professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I found this professor to display a confidence and precision that betrayed expertise in his subject matter and a mastery of human nature.
  • Professor was a total mess, first time teaching I can understand the pressure, but not professional by any means.

Theme 2

📋 About Organization

  • He is very disorganized in
  • as a professional professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILB71 review
PHILOSOPHYB71 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values