AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

George Driver

COM · COMSB1 · C · COMS27 · COMSB2B12 · COMSB10 · COMSB2 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can keep up with reading and notes, but if you need a highly flexible or relaxed lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear when preparedTextbook-heavyHelpful in office hoursOpen-note testsMixed classroom style
  • Most positive reviews say Driver knows the material and helps students who ask questions.
  • Success depends heavily on reading, taking notes, attending, and keeping up with programs.
  • Several students found him boring, rigid, or unclear, so the experience may depend on learning style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A looks realistic with steady reading, notes, attendance, and on-time programs, but it is not a no-effort class.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The material is often described as simple or manageable, but technical reading and acronyms make it more than a walk-through class.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly graded as mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up and participating matter.

Only in-person reviews discuss attendance expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Students recommend him for clear knowledge and help, but several warn about boring lectures, rigidity, and unclear structure.

The recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and achievable when students follow his expected method, but he can be rigid about originality.

Format shift

Only in-person comments discuss grading style.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Homework and programs are reasonable but , and timely completion.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students call him clear, helpful, and knowledgeable, while a minority report boring or poorly structured lectures.

Format shift

Teaching feedback .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and notes, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable teacher whose class is manageable when students read, attend, and ask questions.

Main concern

Some students found lectures boring, rigid, or easy to get lost in without strong self-preparation.

What students said

“Read the chapters, attend class, don't wait until the last minute to do your programs and then you will have an A!”
COMS27
“It is not hard at all either though! and review them!”
COMSB2
“Class structure is very poorly designed and students will get lost very fast.”
COMSB2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In-person reviews explicitly mention open-book, open-note tests and cheat sheets, making the exam style student-friendly.

Open BookOpen NoteCheat Sheets AllowedTests Linked To Lectures

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and cheat sheets, but do not prove proctoring details.

Open BookOpen NoteCheat Sheets Allowed
“his tests, which are open book, open note.”
C
“You get to use cheat sheets for the tests.”
COMSB2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Read the chapters, attend class, don't wait until the last minute to do your programs and then you will have an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, grading, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Mr. Driver was very clear and helpful.”

📘 Effort For Grade

68/100

“Read the chapters, attend class, don't wait until the last minute to do your programs and then you will have an A!”

🧪

82/100

“his tests, which are open book, open note.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is cool. Great teacher who explains well.
  • His lectures are always clear and concise.
  • Knows his stuff, but and shorttempered.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • It is not hard at all either though! and review them!
  • Read your book no matter what.
  • You get to use cheat sheets for the tests.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • Class structure is very poorly designed and students will get lost very fast.
  • It has to be the way he wants it or its wrong!
  • Wants you to come up with his solution for a problem does not reward orginality or creativity.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

There are 14 reviews with consistent themes, but most are old and only one has a recorded grade.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMSB26 reviews
C2 reviews
COM2 reviews
COMS271 review
COMSB11 review
Show 2 more courses
COMSB101 review
COMSB2B121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values