AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Yvonne Ortiz Bush

EDCSCSUB · PS101 · PSYCB1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and can manage your own deadlines without being spoon-fed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorFlexible StyleSmart but IndependentLenient Test Credit
  • Students describe her as caring, flexible, and willing to help struggling students.
  • The course can lead to an A, but students still need to participate and study.
  • Evidence is limited to three old in-person reviews, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A appears very possible because she helps students and , but students still need to study and participate.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students call her easy and flexible, but the course still requires processing material and studying.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

She is described as flexible, but participation is still expected.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

teacher who rewards effort.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because she gives credit .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload does not sound heavy, but students still need to participate and study.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most comments describe her as smart, caring, and helpful, though one review is strongly negative and vague.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention participation, studying, and tests, but do not clearly describe the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing flexibility, help, and .

Main concern

Students who need constant reminders may struggle.

What students said

“She is flexible and easy-going, but still requires students participate and process material.”
EDCSCSUB
“She really cares about her students”
PSYCB1A
“I really had to study hard but I got an "A"in the class!”
PSYCB1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and possible credit back, but they do not .

Tests MentionedPossible Credit Back

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and credit back for commonly missed questions, but .

Tests MentionedPossible Credit Back
“if she thinks alot of people will miss the same questions on the even if you get them wrong.”
PSYCB1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is flexible and easy-going, but still requires students participate and process material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She is a great teacher.”

⚖️

82/100

“she will give you credit for them even if you get them wrong.”

📈 Effort for A

78/100

“I really had to study hard but I got an "A"in the class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Bush is a good teacher.
  • She is flexible and easy-going, but still requires students participate and process material.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • she took the time to help me
  • She really cares about her students

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • I really had to study hard but I got an "A"in the class!
  • she will give you credit for them even if you get them wrong.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but two detailed positive reviews are consistent enough to support a cautious read.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EDCSCSUB1 review
PS1011 review
PSYCB1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values