AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Jennifer Gardner

POLYSB1 · POLSOLN · POLSB1 · POLIB1 · POLB1 · POLYB1A · HISTB17A · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with steady writing work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHighly OrganizedVery HelpfulFast CommunicationFair GradingWriting Workload
  • Students consistently praise her organization, helpfulness, and fast responses.
  • The class is manageable and often an easy A if students keep up with , and posts.
  • Workload can be steady, especially with essays and weekly forum activity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students say the class can be an easy A with , and staying current on assignments.

All evidence is treated as in-person because isForOnlineClass is false for every review despite several comments mentioning online classes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The material is usually described as clear and manageable, though summer pace and writing expectations add some challenge.

rules.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews , and many comments discuss remote-style communication rather than physical attendance.

The authoritative format count is in person, but because comments often describe online-style coursework.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and .

Recommendation evidence is counted as .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe fair grading, study guides, , and a manageable path to an A when work is completed.

Format shift

as in-person under the authoritative format fields.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The class is manageable but , and .

Format shift

All workload evidence is counted as in-person despite many .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly praise her organization, helpfulness, responsiveness, and ability to make the subject engaging.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is treated as .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessments include essays, discussion posts, tests, study guides, and some .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Authoritative format counts classify all reviews as in person, and the evidence shows an and steady writing work.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and .

What students said

“Awesome professor. , and knowledgeable.”
POLSB1
“a lot of work, but easy.”
POLSB1
“She requires 2-3 essays, and 4 tests that were multiple choice with .”
POLYB1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence points to standard tests supported by study guides, with multiple choice and an essay question, but .

Study GuidesMultiple Choice TestsEssay QuestionFour Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and multiple-choice tests with an essay question, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Study GuidesMultiple Choice TestsEssay QuestionFour Tests
“She requires 2-3 essays, and 4 tests that were multiple choice with .”
POLYB1A
“Always very helpfull and provides study guides for exams.”
POLYSB1
“Gives study guides too for all tests!”
POLYB1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Took the online class... a lot of work, but easy. Professor Gardner has her online class set up to run so efficiently.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in organization, support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Awesome professor. , and knowledgeable.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“Great teacher! so helpful, i recommend 100%”

⚖️

82/100

“She lets you know exactly what she expects and grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very enthused about her class & makes you want to learn.
  • Her responses are thoughtful and .
  • Great professor, easy to understand, as well as clear.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you kept up with the reading and .
  • History is one of and I managed to get an A.
  • She requires 2-3 essays, and 4 tests that were multiple choice with .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Communication

  • She was extremely helpful, quick .
  • She is so helpful and wants her students to pass.
  • She always got back right away.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews show a consistent pattern of strong support, though several comments conflict with the .

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLSB112 reviews
HISTB17A2 reviews
POLB11 review
POLIB11 review
POLSOLN1 review
Show 2 more courses
POLYB1A1 review
POLYSB11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values