AI Rate Professor

English

Michael Braggo

ENGLIB50 · ENGB1 · ENGB51 · ENGLB50 · ENGLB1 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you have no alternative and can manage the course mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrong AvoidRude BehaviorDisorganizedNegative Classroom ClimatePoor Student Respect
  • Every review is negative and several directly .
  • Students describe rude behavior, including publicly insulting or discussing students.
  • One review says he forgot papers and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

No review describes an easy A, and the negative classroom experience likely makes earning a strong grade harder than the workload alone suggests.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is not clearly described as conceptually hard, but poor teaching and organization make the class feel difficult.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do .

There is no online evidence, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

because of rude behavior, disorganization, and a hostile classroom tone.

All and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and the course is rated difficult with no positive grade evidence.

Format shift

and is sparse.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload specifics are limited, but forgotten papers and course structure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews repeatedly describe him as , and among the .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

The only assessment evidence mentions papers and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, focusing on rudeness, disorganization, and a poor classroom environment.

Main concern

The main concern is disrespectful behavior and a class experience students strongly warn against.

What students said

“ ”
ENGB51
“he would come into class smelling of alcohol and and .”
ENGLB50
“This teacher was rude!”
ENGLB1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or exam difficulty.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! He is one of the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality, professionalism, and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“He is one of the !”

👍 Recommendation Level

8/100

“please !!!”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

12/100

“He is really rude and does talk about you to the entire class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • He is Horrible!!!!!
  • horrible teacher!!!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • he would come into class smelling of alcohol
  • He is really rude
  • He didn't care about other peoples feelings

Theme 3

📚 About Organization

  • and .
  • I thought maybe I could stick it out but finally dropped that last day I could.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Five old but highly consistent in-person reviews strongly agree on negative classroom behavior and recommendation.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGB11 review
ENGB511 review
ENGLB11 review
ENGLB501 review
ENGLIB501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values